NA-NAMRA-04822224-FTBM Positive Vibes Trust This activity focuses on strengthening the capacities of LGBTIQ+ civil society to lobby and advocate for their human and socioeconomic rights; Building LGBTIQ+ civil society Influencing norms and public opinion Lobby and advocacy for legal and policy change Economic Development The people we are targeting are LGBTIQ+ individuals, groups and organisations LGBTIQ+ people face discrimination, violence and stigma in almost all facets of their lives - from access to justice, economic opportunities and employment, education as well as in health care. Hivos Positive Vibes Positive Vibes Positive Vibes info@positivevibes.org https://positivevibes.org/ 49 Pasteur Street, Windhoek West, PO Box 25396 Middle East, regional Western Africa, regional Eastern Africa, regional Southern Africa, regional South Asia, regional Human Rights 82591 881846 937526 178522 87681 3000000 Incoming committment from donor Hivos Positive Vibes 200848 First installment Hivos Positive Vibes 1047404 Second installment Hivos Positive Vibes 1111362 Third installment Hivos Positive Vibes 333048 Forth installment Hivos Positive Vibes NA-NAMRA-04822224-FTBM-EA Positive Vibes Trust This activity focuses on strengthening the capacities of LGBTIQ+ civil society to lobby and advocate for their human and socioeconomic rights; Building LGBTIQ+ civil society Influencing norms and public opinion Lobby and advocacy for legal and policy change Economic Development The people we are targeting are LGBTIQ+ individuals, groups and organisations LGBTIQ+ people face discrimination, violence and stigma in almost all facets of their lives - from access to justice, economic opportunities and employment, education as well as in health care. Positive Vibes Positive Vibes Positive Vibes info@positivevibes.org https://positivevibes.org/ 49 Pasteur Street, Windhoek West, PO Box 25396 Eastern Africa, regional Human Rights 21267 214075 299037 55824 30714 4325.59 Expenditures Q1-2 2021 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 18750.05 Expenditures Q3-4 2021 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 56553 Expenditures Q1-2 2022 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 108048.91 Expenditures Q3-4 2022 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 56706.45 Expenditures Q1-2 2023 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 99130.35 Expenditures Q3-4 2023 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 135361.73 Expenditures Q1-2 2024 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 114133.62 Expenditures Q3-4 2024 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes Discriminatory laws and policies persist in this region, and there is minimal protection. Although some countries are less hostile than others. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe Discriminatory laws and policies persist in this region, and there is minimal protection. Although some countries are less hostile than others. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe Discriminatory laws and policies persist in this region, and there is minimal protection. Although some countries are less hostile than others. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe CSOs working on LGBTQ rights have seen come successes but this is often coupled with significant backlash in certain countries. Registration of organisations remains difficult. Creating awareness of LGBTQ issues with key stakeholders and the public is important. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe This region largely remains hostile to NGOs working on LGBTIQ+ issues. These report challenges in obtaining legal registration and carrying out legal fundraising due to government legislation and policies that restrict organizing on these issues on the grounds that they are promoting illegal (same sex) relations. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe NA-NAMRA-04822224-FTBM-MENA Positive Vibes Trust This activity focuses on strengthening the capacities of LGBTIQ+ civil society to lobby and advocate for their human and socioeconomic rights; Building LGBTIQ+ civil society Influencing norms and public opinion Lobby and advocacy for legal and policy change Economic Development The people we are targeting are LGBTIQ+ individuals, groups and organisations LGBTIQ+ people face discrimination, violence and stigma in almost all facets of their lives - from access to justice, economic opportunities and employment, education as well as in health care. Positive Vibes Positive Vibes Positive Vibes info@positivevibes.org https://positivevibes.org/ 49 Pasteur Street, Windhoek West, PO Box 25396 Middle East, regional Human Rights 15573 199593 84102 17841 3522 4325.59 Expenditures Q1-2 2021 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 18750.05 Expenditures Q3-4 2021 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 26162 Expenditures Q1-2 2022 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 40359.67 Expenditures Q3-4 2022 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 133930.25 Expenditures Q1-2 2023 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 85320.21 Expenditures Q3-4 2023 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 40673.75 Expenditures Q1-2 2024 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 58605.85 Expenditures Q3-4 2024 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes The region remains largely hostile to LGBTQ people and rights. Soem countries explcitly criminalise homosexuality, while in other countries discriminatory laws are less obvious, but nevertheless these are used to target LGBTQ people. However, in other countries these laws are not often applied which can create a relatively more secure environment. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe The region remains largely hostile to LGBTQ people and rights. Soem countries explcitly criminalise homosexuality, while in other countries discriminatory laws are less obvious, but nevertheless these are used to target LGBTQ people. However, in other countries these laws are not often applied which can create a relatively more secure environment. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe The region remains largely hostile to LGBTQ people and rights. Soem countries explcitly criminalise homosexuality, while in other countries discriminatory laws are less obvious, but nevertheless these are used to target LGBTQ people. However, in other countries these laws are not often applied which can create a relatively more secure environment. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe Recent laws have criminalised certain NGO work and interference by governments is common. Nevertheless, several countries have strong civil society movements and organisations. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe NA-NAMRA-04822224-FTBM-SA Positive Vibes Trust This activity focuses on strengthening the capacities of LGBTIQ+ civil society to lobby and advocate for their human and socioeconomic rights; Building LGBTIQ+ civil society Influencing norms and public opinion Lobby and advocacy for legal and policy change Economic Development The people we are targeting are LGBTIQ+ individuals, groups and organisations LGBTIQ+ people face discrimination, violence and stigma in almost all facets of their lives - from access to justice, economic opportunities and employment, education as well as in health care. Positive Vibes Positive Vibes Positive Vibes info@positivevibes.org https://positivevibes.org/ 49 Pasteur Street, Windhoek West, PO Box 25396 Southern Africa, regional Human Rights 21191 149200 298961 55747 30621 4325.59 Expenditures Q1-2 2021 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 18750.05 Expenditures Q3-4 2021 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 67318 Expenditures Q1-2 2022 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 53838.79 Expenditures Q3-4 2022 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 187384.92 Expenditures Q1-2 2023 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 143926.32 Expenditures Q3-4 2023 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 73395.3 Expenditures Q1-2 2024 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 69345.9 Expenditures Q3-4 2024 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes There are moves in some countries away from discriminatory laws and/or towards protective laws. This has led to decriminalisation of homosexuality in some. Even in these instances there is a need to tackle other exclusionary policy and legislation around rape, domestic violence, health/HIV to work towards recognition and inclusion. However in others, criminalisation and discriminatory laws are entrenched, for example, transgender and intersex persons are denied gender recognition options, adult consensual same-sex acts are criminalised, and there are limited provisions for anti-discrimination in other legislation like labour, consitutions, and marriage. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe There are moves in some countries away from discriminatory laws and/or towards protective laws. This has led to decriminalisation of homosexuality in some. Even in these instances there is a need to tackle other exclusionary policy and legislation around rape, domestic violence, health/HIV to work towards recognition and inclusion. However in others, criminalisation and discriminatory laws are entrenched, for example, transgender and intersex persons are denied gender recognition options, adult consensual same-sex acts are criminalised, and there are limited provisions for anti-discrimination in other legislation like labour, consitutions, and marriage. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe There are moves in some countries away from discriminatory laws and/or towards protective laws. This has led to decriminalisation of homosexuality in some. Even in these instances there is a need to tackle other exclusionary policy and legislation around rape, domestic violence, health/HIV to work towards recognition and inclusion. However in others, criminalisation and discriminatory laws are entrenched, for example, transgender and intersex persons are denied gender recognition options, adult consensual same-sex acts are criminalised, and there are limited provisions for anti-discrimination in other legislation like labour, consitutions, and marriage. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe Certain countries have seen the shrinking of civil society space in recent years - seen in generally restrictive legislation for CSOs and barriers to LGBTQ CSOs to register. However, even in the most hostile environments, there is a growing strength and recognition of civil society organisations working on LGBTQ issues. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe NA-NAMRA-04822224-FTBM-SEA Positive Vibes Trust This activity focuses on strengthening the capacities of LGBTIQ+ civil society to lobby and advocate for their human and socioeconomic rights; Building LGBTIQ+ civil society Influencing norms and public opinion Lobby and advocacy for legal and policy change Economic Development The people we are targeting are LGBTIQ+ individuals, groups and organisations LGBTIQ+ people face discrimination, violence and stigma in almost all facets of their lives - from access to justice, economic opportunities and employment, education as well as in health care. Positive Vibes Positive Vibes Positive Vibes info@positivevibes.org https://positivevibes.org/ 49 Pasteur Street, Windhoek West, PO Box 25396 South Asia, regional Human Rights 10382 133062 56068 11894 2348 4325.59 Expenditures Q1-2 2021 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 18750.05 Expenditures Q3-4 2021 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 112366 Expenditures Q1-2 2022 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 53263.47 Expenditures Q3-4 2022 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 74592.84 Expenditures Q1-2 2023 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 66660.68 Expenditures Q3-4 2023 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 40673.75 Expenditures Q1-2 2024 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 59036.44 Expenditures Q3-4 2024 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes Some protective laws being introduced alongside discriminatory laws. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe Some protective laws being introduced alongside discriminatory laws. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe Some protective laws being introduced alongside discriminatory laws. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe Some recent success in the region from CSO and individual activists advocacy We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe The programme is targeting LGBTIQ+ CSOs including LBQ, TGNC and Intersex organizations We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe NA-NAMRA-04822224-FTBM-WA Positive Vibes Trust This activity focuses on strengthening the capacities of LGBTIQ+ civil society to lobby and advocate for their human and socioeconomic rights; Building LGBTIQ+ civil society Influencing norms and public opinion Lobby and advocacy for legal and policy change Economic Development The people we are targeting are LGBTIQ+ individuals, groups and organisations LGBTIQ+ people face discrimination, violence and stigma in almost all facets of their lives - from access to justice, economic opportunities and employment, education as well as in health care. Positive Vibes Positive Vibes Positive Vibes info@positivevibes.org https://positivevibes.org/ 49 Pasteur Street, Windhoek West, PO Box 25396 Western Africa, regional Human Rights 14178 185916 199358 37216 20476 4325.59 Expenditures Q1-2 2021 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 18750.05 Expenditures Q3-4 2021 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 79857 Expenditures Q1-2 2022 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 75114.7 Expenditures Q3-4 2022 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 22819.05 Expenditures Q1-2 2023 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 127283.7 Expenditures Q3-4 2023 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 70460.48 Expenditures Q1-2 2024 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 102048.71 Expenditures Q3-4 2024 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes The region is largely hostile with many countries still upholding discriminatory laws including criminalisation. In certain countries, some more progressive laws are on hold and/or are not being domesticated. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe The region is largely hostile with many countries still upholding discriminatory laws including criminalisation. In certain countries, some more progressive laws are on hold and/or are not being domesticated. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe The region is largely hostile with many countries still upholding discriminatory laws including criminalisation. In certain countries, some more progressive laws are on hold and/or are not being domesticated. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe Civil society organising around LGBTQ issues remains extremely difficult given the prevailing public and legal framework. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under Free2BeMe NA-NAMRA-04822224-WL Positive Vibes Trust This acitvity focuses on supporting young women rightsholders to claim their sexual and reproductive health and rights The goal for this activity is by the end of 2025, have resilient young women who play a leading role in strengthened and inclusive organisations and movements that enjoy increased public support and have convinced duty-bearers and health-service providers to take steps towards implementing laws, policies and practices that respect and protect these young women’s SRH-R. The people we are targeting are young women with disabilities, living with HIV, affected by displacement and/or identifying as LBTI. Hivos Positive Vibes Positive Vibes Positive Vibes Trust info@positivevibes.org https://positivevibes.org 49 Pasteur Street, Windhoek, Namibia Namibia Uganda Kenya Nigeria Niger Mozambique Guatemala Honduras Lebanon Jordan Reproductive health care 436900.89 1003358.67 378058.86 312540.51 231259.07 2362118 HIVOS grant budget HIVOS Positive Vibes 436900.89 First installment (2021) HIVOS Positive Vibes 1003359 Second Installment (2022) HIVOS Positive Vibes 378059 Third Installment (2023) HIVOS Positive Vibes 312541 Fourth Installment (2024) HIVOS Positive Vibes 103819 Fifth Installment (2025) HIVOS Positive Vibes 21016.83 First Semester (2026) HIVOS Positive Vibes NA-NAMRA-04822224-WL-GT Positive Vibes Trust This acitvity focuses on supporting young women rightsholders to claim their sexual and reproductive health and rights The goal for this activity is by the end of 2025, have resilient young women who play a leading role in strengthened and inclusive organisations and movements that enjoy increased public support and have convinced duty-bearers and health-service providers to take steps towards implementing laws, policies and practices that respect and protect these young women’s SRH-R. The people we are targeting are young women with disabilities, living with HIV, affected by displacement and/or identifying as LBTI. Positive Vibes Positive Vibes Positive Vibes Trust info@positivevibes.org https://positivevibes.org 49 Pasteur Street, Windhoek, Namibia Namibia Guatemala Reproductive health care 10139.93 85759.01 34223.99 10324.23 11272.27 3557.19 Expenditure Q1-Q2 21 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 3834.48 Expenditure Q3-Q4 21 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 41852.12 Expenditure Q1-Q2 22 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 35762.01 Expenditure Q3-Q4 22 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 52924.06 Expenditure Q1-Q2 23 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 53807.42 Expenditure Q3-Q4 23 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 6442.65 Expenditure Q1-Q2 24 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 23135.45 Expenditure Q3-Q4 24 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 24568.03 Expenditure Q1-Q2 25 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 38340.29 Expenditure Q3-Q4 25 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes In Guatemala, conservative parties and movements have been gaining power over the last years, co-opting several spaces in the government and in state institutions. The conservative attitude at political level is reflected in the laws and policies concerning SRH-R issues. For instance, in 2017, the Supreme Court of Justice blocked the distribution of a Manual on Sexual and Reproductive Rights and urged CSOs to stop issuing any manual or carrying out any activity that seeks to support and encourage abortion or abortive practices, although in the country abortion is allowed under certain circumstances. Moreover, in 2018, the Women’s Commission of Congress gave an unfavorable edict about a Gender Identity Law proposed by organizations of trans-women. Finally, in 2019, members of the Guatemalan congress have revived an initiative to pass the “Protecting Life and Family” law (Decree 5272) which seeks to criminalize abortion in all forms (including miscarriage) as well as same-sex marriage, and prohibits to both, private and public institutions, to promote comprehensive sex education and any issues related to sexual diversity and “gender identity’. The law would also require doctors to register miscarriages in the National Registry of Persons (RENAP), turning them into ‘police officer’. This proposal has currently advanced to second lecture within the Congress. On a positive note, Congress unsuccessfully sought dismissal of the Ombudsman (prosecutor) for defending the rights of LGBTI people and access to abortion. Considering that Guatemala will go under election in 2023 and that it is foreseen that conservative parties will remain in power, the best way to improve SRH-R status seems to be by working on the incorporation of SRH-R elements in existing policies and in the implementation of existing laws, rather than by promoting new legislations that require approval by the Congress. In particular, the Women Secretariat and the Ministry of Health can be engaged to support the inclusion and expansion of SRH-R issues in the current legal and political setting We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead In Guatemala, conservative parties and movements have been gaining power over the last years, co-opting several spaces in the government and in state institutions. The conservative attitude at political level is reflected in the laws and policies concerning SRH-R issues. For instance, in 2017, the Supreme Court of Justice blocked the distribution of a Manual on Sexual and Reproductive Rights and urged CSOs to stop issuing any manual or carrying out any activity that seeks to support and encourage abortion or abortive practices, although in the country abortion is allowed under certain circumstances. Moreover, in 2018, the Women’s Commission of Congress gave an unfavorable edict about a Gender Identity Law proposed by organizations of trans-women. Finally, in 2019, members of the Guatemalan congress have revived an initiative to pass the “Protecting Life and Family” law (Decree 5272) which seeks to criminalize abortion in all forms (including miscarriage) as well as same-sex marriage, and prohibits to both, private and public institutions, to promote comprehensive sex education and any issues related to sexual diversity and “gender identity’. The law would also require doctors to register miscarriages in the National Registry of Persons (RENAP), turning them into ‘police officer’. This proposal has currently advanced to second lecture within the Congress. On a positive note, Congress unsuccessfully sought dismissal of the Ombudsman (prosecutor) for defending the rights of LGBTI people and access to abortion. Considering that Guatemala will go under election in 2023 and that it is foreseen that conservative parties will remain in power, the best way to improve SRH-R status seems to be by working on the incorporation of SRH-R elements in existing policies and in the implementation of existing laws, rather than by promoting new legislations that require approval by the Congress. In particular, the Women Secretariat and the Ministry of Health can be engaged to support the inclusion and expansion of SRH-R issues in the current legal and political setting We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead In Guatemala, conservative parties and movements have been gaining power over the last years, co-opting several spaces in the government and in state institutions. The conservative attitude at political level is reflected in the laws and policies concerning SRH-R issues. For instance, in 2017, the Supreme Court of Justice blocked the distribution of a Manual on Sexual and Reproductive Rights and urged CSOs to stop issuing any manual or carrying out any activity that seeks to support and encourage abortion or abortive practices, although in the country abortion is allowed under certain circumstances. Moreover, in 2018, the Women’s Commission of Congress gave an unfavorable edict about a Gender Identity Law proposed by organizations of trans-women. Finally, in 2019, members of the Guatemalan congress have revived an initiative to pass the “Protecting Life and Family” law (Decree 5272) which seeks to criminalize abortion in all forms (including miscarriage) as well as same-sex marriage, and prohibits to both, private and public institutions, to promote comprehensive sex education and any issues related to sexual diversity and “gender identity’. The law would also require doctors to register miscarriages in the National Registry of Persons (RENAP), turning them into ‘police officer’. This proposal has currently advanced to second lecture within the Congress. On a positive note, Congress unsuccessfully sought dismissal of the Ombudsman (prosecutor) for defending the rights of LGBTI people and access to abortion. Considering that Guatemala will go under election in 2023 and that it is foreseen that conservative parties will remain in power, the best way to improve SRH-R status seems to be by working on the incorporation of SRH-R elements in existing policies and in the implementation of existing laws, rather than by promoting new legislations that require approval by the Congress. In particular, the Women Secretariat and the Ministry of Health can be engaged to support the inclusion and expansion of SRH-R issues in the current legal and political setting We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead In Guatemala, conservative parties and movements have been gaining power over the last years, co-opting several spaces in the government and in state institutions. The conservative attitude at political level is reflected in the laws and policies concerning SRH-R issues. For instance, in 2017, the Supreme Court of Justice blocked the distribution of a Manual on Sexual and Reproductive Rights and urged CSOs to stop issuing any manual or carrying out any activity that seeks to support and encourage abortion or abortive practices, although in the country abortion is allowed under certain circumstances. Moreover, in 2018, the Women’s Commission of Congress gave an unfavorable edict about a Gender Identity Law proposed by organizations of trans-women. Finally, in 2019, members of the Guatemalan congress have revived an initiative to pass the “Protecting Life and Family” law (Decree 5272) which seeks to criminalize abortion in all forms (including miscarriage) as well as same-sex marriage, and prohibits to both, private and public institutions, to promote comprehensive sex education and any issues related to sexual diversity and “gender identity’. The law would also require doctors to register miscarriages in the National Registry of Persons (RENAP), turning them into ‘police officer’. This proposal has currently advanced to second lecture within the Congress. On a positive note, Congress unsuccessfully sought dismissal of the Ombudsman (prosecutor) for defending the rights of LGBTI people and access to abortion. Considering that Guatemala will go under election in 2023 and that it is foreseen that conservative parties will remain in power, the best way to improve SRH-R status seems to be by working on the incorporation of SRH-R elements in existing policies and in the implementation of existing laws, rather than by promoting new legislations that require approval by the Congress. In particular, the Women Secretariat and the Ministry of Health can be engaged to support the inclusion and expansion of SRH-R issues in the current legal and political setting We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead In Guatemala, conservative parties and movements have been gaining power over the last years, co-opting several spaces in the government and in state institutions. The conservative attitude at political level is reflected in the laws and policies concerning SRH-R issues. For instance, in 2017, the Supreme Court of Justice blocked the distribution of a Manual on Sexual and Reproductive Rights and urged CSOs to stop issuing any manual or carrying out any activity that seeks to support and encourage abortion or abortive practices, although in the country abortion is allowed under certain circumstances. Moreover, in 2018, the Women’s Commission of Congress gave an unfavorable edict about a Gender Identity Law proposed by organizations of trans-women. Finally, in 2019, members of the Guatemalan congress have revived an initiative to pass the “Protecting Life and Family” law (Decree 5272) which seeks to criminalize abortion in all forms (including miscarriage) as well as same-sex marriage, and prohibits to both, private and public institutions, to promote comprehensive sex education and any issues related to sexual diversity and “gender identity’. The law would also require doctors to register miscarriages in the National Registry of Persons (RENAP), turning them into ‘police officer’. This proposal has currently advanced to second lecture within the Congress. On a positive note, Congress unsuccessfully sought dismissal of the Ombudsman (prosecutor) for defending the rights of LGBTI people and access to abortion. Considering that Guatemala will go under election in 2023 and that it is foreseen that conservative parties will remain in power, the best way to improve SRH-R status seems to be by working on the incorporation of SRH-R elements in existing policies and in the implementation of existing laws, rather than by promoting new legislations that require approval by the Congress. In particular, the Women Secretariat and the Ministry of Health can be engaged to support the inclusion and expansion of SRH-R issues in the current legal and political setting We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead In Guatemala, conservative parties and movements have been gaining power over the last years, co-opting several spaces in the government and in state institutions. The conservative attitude at political level is reflected in the laws and policies concerning SRH-R issues. For instance, in 2017, the Supreme Court of Justice blocked the distribution of a Manual on Sexual and Reproductive Rights and urged CSOs to stop issuing any manual or carrying out any activity that seeks to support and encourage abortion or abortive practices, although in the country abortion is allowed under certain circumstances. Moreover, in 2018, the Women’s Commission of Congress gave an unfavorable edict about a Gender Identity Law proposed by organizations of trans-women. Finally, in 2019, members of the Guatemalan congress have revived an initiative to pass the “Protecting Life and Family” law (Decree 5272) which seeks to criminalize abortion in all forms (including miscarriage) as well as same-sex marriage, and prohibits to both, private and public institutions, to promote comprehensive sex education and any issues related to sexual diversity and “gender identity’. The law would also require doctors to register miscarriages in the National Registry of Persons (RENAP), turning them into ‘police officer’. This proposal has currently advanced to second lecture within the Congress. On a positive note, Congress unsuccessfully sought dismissal of the Ombudsman (prosecutor) for defending the rights of LGBTI people and access to abortion. Considering that Guatemala will go under election in 2023 and that it is foreseen that conservative parties will remain in power, the best way to improve SRH-R status seems to be by working on the incorporation of SRH-R elements in existing policies and in the implementation of existing laws, rather than by promoting new legislations that require approval by the Congress. In particular, the Women Secretariat and the Ministry of Health can be engaged to support the inclusion and expansion of SRH-R issues in the current legal and political setting We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead In Guatemala, conservative parties and movements have been gaining power over the last years, co-opting several spaces in the government and in state institutions. The conservative attitude at political level is reflected in the laws and policies concerning SRH-R issues. For instance, in 2017, the Supreme Court of Justice blocked the distribution of a Manual on Sexual and Reproductive Rights and urged CSOs to stop issuing any manual or carrying out any activity that seeks to support and encourage abortion or abortive practices, although in the country abortion is allowed under certain circumstances. Moreover, in 2018, the Women’s Commission of Congress gave an unfavorable edict about a Gender Identity Law proposed by organizations of trans-women. Finally, in 2019, members of the Guatemalan congress have revived an initiative to pass the “Protecting Life and Family” law (Decree 5272) which seeks to criminalize abortion in all forms (including miscarriage) as well as same-sex marriage, and prohibits to both, private and public institutions, to promote comprehensive sex education and any issues related to sexual diversity and “gender identity’. The law would also require doctors to register miscarriages in the National Registry of Persons (RENAP), turning them into ‘police officer’. This proposal has currently advanced to second lecture within the Congress. On a positive note, Congress unsuccessfully sought dismissal of the Ombudsman (prosecutor) for defending the rights of LGBTI people and access to abortion. Considering that Guatemala will go under election in 2023 and that it is foreseen that conservative parties will remain in power, the best way to improve SRH-R status seems to be by working on the incorporation of SRH-R elements in existing policies and in the implementation of existing laws, rather than by promoting new legislations that require approval by the Congress. In particular, the Women Secretariat and the Ministry of Health can be engaged to support the inclusion and expansion of SRH-R issues in the current legal and political setting We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead In Guatemala, conservative parties and movements have been gaining power over the last years, co-opting several spaces in the government and in state institutions. The conservative attitude at political level is reflected in the laws and policies concerning SRH-R issues. For instance, in 2017, the Supreme Court of Justice blocked the distribution of a Manual on Sexual and Reproductive Rights and urged CSOs to stop issuing any manual or carrying out any activity that seeks to support and encourage abortion or abortive practices, although in the country abortion is allowed under certain circumstances. Moreover, in 2018, the Women’s Commission of Congress gave an unfavorable edict about a Gender Identity Law proposed by organizations of trans-women. Finally, in 2019, members of the Guatemalan congress have revived an initiative to pass the “Protecting Life and Family” law (Decree 5272) which seeks to criminalize abortion in all forms (including miscarriage) as well as same-sex marriage, and prohibits to both, private and public institutions, to promote comprehensive sex education and any issues related to sexual diversity and “gender identity’. The law would also require doctors to register miscarriages in the National Registry of Persons (RENAP), turning them into ‘police officer’. This proposal has currently advanced to second lecture within the Congress. On a positive note, Congress unsuccessfully sought dismissal of the Ombudsman (prosecutor) for defending the rights of LGBTI people and access to abortion. Considering that Guatemala will go under election in 2023 and that it is foreseen that conservative parties will remain in power, the best way to improve SRH-R status seems to be by working on the incorporation of SRH-R elements in existing policies and in the implementation of existing laws, rather than by promoting new legislations that require approval by the Congress. In particular, the Women Secretariat and the Ministry of Health can be engaged to support the inclusion and expansion of SRH-R issues in the current legal and political setting We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead In Guatemala, conservative parties and movements have been gaining power over the last years, co-opting several spaces in the government and in state institutions. The conservative attitude at political level is reflected in the laws and policies concerning SRH-R issues. For instance, in 2017, the Supreme Court of Justice blocked the distribution of a Manual on Sexual and Reproductive Rights and urged CSOs to stop issuing any manual or carrying out any activity that seeks to support and encourage abortion or abortive practices, although in the country abortion is allowed under certain circumstances. Moreover, in 2018, the Women’s Commission of Congress gave an unfavorable edict about a Gender Identity Law proposed by organizations of trans-women. Finally, in 2019, members of the Guatemalan congress have revived an initiative to pass the “Protecting Life and Family” law (Decree 5272) which seeks to criminalize abortion in all forms (including miscarriage) as well as same-sex marriage, and prohibits to both, private and public institutions, to promote comprehensive sex education and any issues related to sexual diversity and “gender identity’. The law would also require doctors to register miscarriages in the National Registry of Persons (RENAP), turning them into ‘police officer’. This proposal has currently advanced to second lecture within the Congress. On a positive note, Congress unsuccessfully sought dismissal of the Ombudsman (prosecutor) for defending the rights of LGBTI people and access to abortion. Considering that Guatemala will go under election in 2023 and that it is foreseen that conservative parties will remain in power, the best way to improve SRH-R status seems to be by working on the incorporation of SRH-R elements in existing policies and in the implementation of existing laws, rather than by promoting new legislations that require approval by the Congress. In particular, the Women Secretariat and the Ministry of Health can be engaged to support the inclusion and expansion of SRH-R issues in the current legal and political setting We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead In Guatemala, conservative parties and movements have been gaining power over the last years, co-opting several spaces in the government and in state institutions. The conservative attitude at political level is reflected in the laws and policies concerning SRH-R issues. For instance, in 2017, the Supreme Court of Justice blocked the distribution of a Manual on Sexual and Reproductive Rights and urged CSOs to stop issuing any manual or carrying out any activity that seeks to support and encourage abortion or abortive practices, although in the country abortion is allowed under certain circumstances. Moreover, in 2018, the Women’s Commission of Congress gave an unfavorable edict about a Gender Identity Law proposed by organizations of trans-women. Finally, in 2019, members of the Guatemalan congress have revived an initiative to pass the “Protecting Life and Family” law (Decree 5272) which seeks to criminalize abortion in all forms (including miscarriage) as well as same-sex marriage, and prohibits to both, private and public institutions, to promote comprehensive sex education and any issues related to sexual diversity and “gender identity’. The law would also require doctors to register miscarriages in the National Registry of Persons (RENAP), turning them into ‘police officer’. This proposal has currently advanced to second lecture within the Congress. On a positive note, Congress unsuccessfully sought dismissal of the Ombudsman (prosecutor) for defending the rights of LGBTI people and access to abortion. Considering that Guatemala will go under election in 2023 and that it is foreseen that conservative parties will remain in power, the best way to improve SRH-R status seems to be by working on the incorporation of SRH-R elements in existing policies and in the implementation of existing laws, rather than by promoting new legislations that require approval by the Congress. In particular, the Women Secretariat and the Ministry of Health can be engaged to support the inclusion and expansion of SRH-R issues in the current legal and political setting We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead NA-NAMRA-04822224-WL-HN Positive Vibes Trust This acitvity focuses on supporting young women rightsholders to claim their sexual and reproductive health and rights The goal for this activity is by the end of 2025, have resilient young women who play a leading role in strengthened and inclusive organisations and movements that enjoy increased public support and have convinced duty-bearers and health-service providers to take steps towards implementing laws, policies and practices that respect and protect these young women’s SRH-R. The people we are targeting are young women with disabilities, living with HIV, affected by displacement and/or identifying as LBTI. Positive Vibes Positive Vibes Positive Vibes Trust info@positivevibes.org https://positivevibes.org 49 Pasteur Street, Windhoek, Namibia Namibia Honduras Reproductive health care 10139.93 85759.01 34223.99 10324.23 11272.27 3557.19 Expenditure Q1-Q2 21 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 3834.48 Expenditure Q3-Q4 21 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 34739.81 Expenditure Q1-Q2 22 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 17907.66 Expenditure Q3-Q4 22 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 14526.89 Expenditure Q1-Q2 23 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 67408 Expenditure Q3-Q4 23 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 36107.49 Expenditure Q1-Q2 24 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 13617.38 Expenditure Q3-Q4 24 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 14672.57 Expenditure Q1-Q2 25 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 26684.73 Expenditure Q3-Q4 25 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes Several organizations that are part of the CoA have experience in advocacy, and are knowledgeable about the status of laws and policies concerning their constituencies, since they push for them, and form part of coalitions and networks that promote changes in policies and defend their rights. On the other hand, young women expressed the need to have more and better presence in the spaces where decisions are made and policies are developed. One of the strategies proposed by the CoA is to set up a Thematic Table on SRHR. These kinds of technical tables have proven successful for other issues in the past. The CoA sees this result, as the final result of a strong and sustained effort to raise awareness and train duty bearers about the importance of respecting the SRHR of the four groups of rights holders, and the support gained through campaigns, from the general public, exerting pressure on duty bearers to support and implement laws and policies that respect and protect the SRHR. A mapping and diagnosis of legislation must be implemented, and in addition, an advocacy strategy should be proposed, which takes into account the changing context, particularly after the national elections in 2021. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead Several organizations that are part of the CoA have experience in advocacy, and are knowledgeable about the status of laws and policies concerning their constituencies, since they push for them, and form part of coalitions and networks that promote changes in policies and defend their rights. On the other hand, young women expressed the need to have more and better presence in the spaces where decisions are made and policies are developed. One of the strategies proposed by the CoA is to set up a Thematic Table on SRHR. These kinds of technical tables have proven successful for other issues in the past. The CoA sees this result, as the final result of a strong and sustained effort to raise awareness and train duty bearers about the importance of respecting the SRHR of the four groups of rights holders, and the support gained through campaigns, from the general public, exerting pressure on duty bearers to support and implement laws and policies that respect and protect the SRHR. A mapping and diagnosis of legislation must be implemented, and in addition, an advocacy strategy should be proposed, which takes into account the changing context, particularly after the national elections in 2021. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead Several organizations that are part of the CoA have experience in advocacy, and are knowledgeable about the status of laws and policies concerning their constituencies, since they push for them, and form part of coalitions and networks that promote changes in policies and defend their rights. On the other hand, young women expressed the need to have more and better presence in the spaces where decisions are made and policies are developed. One of the strategies proposed by the CoA is to set up a Thematic Table on SRHR. These kinds of technical tables have proven successful for other issues in the past. The CoA sees this result, as the final result of a strong and sustained effort to raise awareness and train duty bearers about the importance of respecting the SRHR of the four groups of rights holders, and the support gained through campaigns, from the general public, exerting pressure on duty bearers to support and implement laws and policies that respect and protect the SRHR. A mapping and diagnosis of legislation must be implemented, and in addition, an advocacy strategy should be proposed, which takes into account the changing context, particularly after the national elections in 2021. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead Several organizations that are part of the CoA have experience in advocacy, and are knowledgeable about the status of laws and policies concerning their constituencies, since they push for them, and form part of coalitions and networks that promote changes in policies and defend their rights. On the other hand, young women expressed the need to have more and better presence in the spaces where decisions are made and policies are developed. One of the strategies proposed by the CoA is to set up a Thematic Table on SRHR. These kinds of technical tables have proven successful for other issues in the past. The CoA sees this result, as the final result of a strong and sustained effort to raise awareness and train duty bearers about the importance of respecting the SRHR of the four groups of rights holders, and the support gained through campaigns, from the general public, exerting pressure on duty bearers to support and implement laws and policies that respect and protect the SRHR. A mapping and diagnosis of legislation must be implemented, and in addition, an advocacy strategy should be proposed, which takes into account the changing context, particularly after the national elections in 2021. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead Several organizations that are part of the CoA have experience in advocacy, and are knowledgeable about the status of laws and policies concerning their constituencies, since they push for them, and form part of coalitions and networks that promote changes in policies and defend their rights. On the other hand, young women expressed the need to have more and better presence in the spaces where decisions are made and policies are developed. One of the strategies proposed by the CoA is to set up a Thematic Table on SRHR. These kinds of technical tables have proven successful for other issues in the past. The CoA sees this result, as the final result of a strong and sustained effort to raise awareness and train duty bearers about the importance of respecting the SRHR of the four groups of rights holders, and the support gained through campaigns, from the general public, exerting pressure on duty bearers to support and implement laws and policies that respect and protect the SRHR. A mapping and diagnosis of legislation must be implemented, and in addition, an advocacy strategy should be proposed, which takes into account the changing context, particularly after the national elections in 2021. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead Several organizations that are part of the CoA have experience in advocacy, and are knowledgeable about the status of laws and policies concerning their constituencies, since they push for them, and form part of coalitions and networks that promote changes in policies and defend their rights. On the other hand, young women expressed the need to have more and better presence in the spaces where decisions are made and policies are developed. One of the strategies proposed by the CoA is to set up a Thematic Table on SRHR. These kinds of technical tables have proven successful for other issues in the past. The CoA sees this result, as the final result of a strong and sustained effort to raise awareness and train duty bearers about the importance of respecting the SRHR of the four groups of rights holders, and the support gained through campaigns, from the general public, exerting pressure on duty bearers to support and implement laws and policies that respect and protect the SRHR. A mapping and diagnosis of legislation must be implemented, and in addition, an advocacy strategy should be proposed, which takes into account the changing context, particularly after the national elections in 2021. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead Several organizations that are part of the CoA have experience in advocacy, and are knowledgeable about the status of laws and policies concerning their constituencies, since they push for them, and form part of coalitions and networks that promote changes in policies and defend their rights. On the other hand, young women expressed the need to have more and better presence in the spaces where decisions are made and policies are developed. One of the strategies proposed by the CoA is to set up a Thematic Table on SRHR. These kinds of technical tables have proven successful for other issues in the past. The CoA sees this result, as the final result of a strong and sustained effort to raise awareness and train duty bearers about the importance of respecting the SRHR of the four groups of rights holders, and the support gained through campaigns, from the general public, exerting pressure on duty bearers to support and implement laws and policies that respect and protect the SRHR. A mapping and diagnosis of legislation must be implemented, and in addition, an advocacy strategy should be proposed, which takes into account the changing context, particularly after the national elections in 2021. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead Several organizations that are part of the CoA have experience in advocacy, and are knowledgeable about the status of laws and policies concerning their constituencies, since they push for them, and form part of coalitions and networks that promote changes in policies and defend their rights. On the other hand, young women expressed the need to have more and better presence in the spaces where decisions are made and policies are developed. One of the strategies proposed by the CoA is to set up a Thematic Table on SRHR. These kinds of technical tables have proven successful for other issues in the past. The CoA sees this result, as the final result of a strong and sustained effort to raise awareness and train duty bearers about the importance of respecting the SRHR of the four groups of rights holders, and the support gained through campaigns, from the general public, exerting pressure on duty bearers to support and implement laws and policies that respect and protect the SRHR. A mapping and diagnosis of legislation must be implemented, and in addition, an advocacy strategy should be proposed, which takes into account the changing context, particularly after the national elections in 2021. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead Several organizations that are part of the CoA have experience in advocacy, and are knowledgeable about the status of laws and policies concerning their constituencies, since they push for them, and form part of coalitions and networks that promote changes in policies and defend their rights. On the other hand, young women expressed the need to have more and better presence in the spaces where decisions are made and policies are developed. One of the strategies proposed by the CoA is to set up a Thematic Table on SRHR. These kinds of technical tables have proven successful for other issues in the past. The CoA sees this result, as the final result of a strong and sustained effort to raise awareness and train duty bearers about the importance of respecting the SRHR of the four groups of rights holders, and the support gained through campaigns, from the general public, exerting pressure on duty bearers to support and implement laws and policies that respect and protect the SRHR. A mapping and diagnosis of legislation must be implemented, and in addition, an advocacy strategy should be proposed, which takes into account the changing context, particularly after the national elections in 2021. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead Several organizations that are part of the CoA have experience in advocacy, and are knowledgeable about the status of laws and policies concerning their constituencies, since they push for them, and form part of coalitions and networks that promote changes in policies and defend their rights. On the other hand, young women expressed the need to have more and better presence in the spaces where decisions are made and policies are developed. One of the strategies proposed by the CoA is to set up a Thematic Table on SRHR. These kinds of technical tables have proven successful for other issues in the past. The CoA sees this result, as the final result of a strong and sustained effort to raise awareness and train duty bearers about the importance of respecting the SRHR of the four groups of rights holders, and the support gained through campaigns, from the general public, exerting pressure on duty bearers to support and implement laws and policies that respect and protect the SRHR. A mapping and diagnosis of legislation must be implemented, and in addition, an advocacy strategy should be proposed, which takes into account the changing context, particularly after the national elections in 2021. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead NA-NAMRA-04822224-WL-JO Positive Vibes Trust This acitvity focuses on supporting young women rightsholders to claim their sexual and reproductive health and rights The goal for this activity is by the end of 2025, have resilient young women who play a leading role in strengthened and inclusive organisations and movements that enjoy increased public support and have convinced duty-bearers and health-service providers to take steps towards implementing laws, policies and practices that respect and protect these young women’s SRH-R. The people we are targeting are young women with disabilities, living with HIV, affected by displacement and/or identifying as LBTI. Positive Vibes Positive Vibes Positive Vibes Trust info@positivevibes.org https://positivevibes.org 49 Pasteur Street, Windhoek, Namibia Namibia Jordan Reproductive health care 10139.93 85759.01 34223.99 10324.23 11272.27 3557.19 Expenditure Q1-Q2 21 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 3834.48 Expenditure Q3-Q4 21 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 3650.42 Expenditure Q1-Q2 22 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 5402.17 Expenditure Q3-Q4 22 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 25591.73 Expenditure Q1-Q2 23 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 50519.76 Expenditure Q3-Q4 23 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 6039.24 Expenditure Q1-Q2 24 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 6474.03 Expenditure Q3-Q4 24 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 5996.7 Expenditure Q1-Q2 25 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 18008.87 Expenditure Q3-Q4 25 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes The institutional landscape of SRH-R information and services in Jordan has shown weak legislation and programs that implement rights-based approach in the provision of SRH-R information and services. The lack of coordination between international donor organizations that finance SRH-R, including family planning programs, the absence of a unified official arm to coordinate and monitor the work of these organizations and the lack of SRH-R information systems in the country negatively affects the promotion and protection of SRH-R issues. This is largely due to a complex system of social norms and values that inhibit the enforcement of policies and regulations that facilitate their implementation. Social norms and religious discourse are limiting SRH-R progress in a way that the community and the society at large still consider SRH-R a ‘taboo’. Thus, discussions about topic such as abortion, sexual identity and sex outside marriage are not open and need to be addressed at their root causes, by engaging all levels of the society, including households, community and religious leaders. Moreover, at institutional level, the lack of indicators to monitor the implementation of the SRH strategy, and the absence of specific budget allocated to SRH-R information and services make difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of the policies. In addition, there is the need to create an inclusive database that identifies gaps and opportunities for SRH-R improvements and collect disaggregated data about different rightsholder group’s needs. The institutional landscape of SRH-R information and services in Jordan has shown weak legislation and programs that implement rights-based approach in the provision of SRH-R information and services. The lack of coordination between international donor organizations that finance SRH-R, including family planning programs, the absence of a unified official arm to coordinate and monitor the work of these organizations and the lack of SRH-R information systems in the country negatively affects the promotion and protection of SRH-R issues. This is largely due to a complex system of social norms and values that inhibit the enforcement of policies and regulations that facilitate their implementation. Social norms and religious discourse are limiting SRH-R progress in a way that the community and the society at large still consider SRH-R a ‘taboo’. Thus, discussions about topic such as abortion, sexual identity and sex outside marriage are not open and need to be addressed at their root causes, by engaging all levels of the society, including households, community and religious leaders. Moreover, at institutional level, the lack of indicators to monitor the implementation of the SRH strategy, and the absence of specific budget allocated to SRH-R information and services make difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of the policies. In addition, there is the need to create an inclusive database that identifies gaps and opportunities for SRH-R improvements and collect disaggregated data about different rightsholder group’s needs. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The institutional landscape of SRH-R information and services in Jordan has shown weak legislation and programs that implement rights-based approach in the provision of SRH-R information and services. The lack of coordination between international donor organizations that finance SRH-R, including family planning programs, the absence of a unified official arm to coordinate and monitor the work of these organizations and the lack of SRH-R information systems in the country negatively affects the promotion and protection of SRH-R issues. This is largely due to a complex system of social norms and values that inhibit the enforcement of policies and regulations that facilitate their implementation. Social norms and religious discourse are limiting SRH-R progress in a way that the community and the society at large still consider SRH-R a ‘taboo’. Thus, discussions about topic such as abortion, sexual identity and sex outside marriage are not open and need to be addressed at their root causes, by engaging all levels of the society, including households, community and religious leaders. Moreover, at institutional level, the lack of indicators to monitor the implementation of the SRH strategy, and the absence of specific budget allocated to SRH-R information and services make difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of the policies. In addition, there is the need to create an inclusive database that identifies gaps and opportunities for SRH-R improvements and collect disaggregated data about different rightsholder group’s needs. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The institutional landscape of SRH-R information and services in Jordan has shown weak legislation and programs that implement rights-based approach in the provision of SRH-R information and services. The lack of coordination between international donor organizations that finance SRH-R, including family planning programs, the absence of a unified official arm to coordinate and monitor the work of these organizations and the lack of SRH-R information systems in the country negatively affects the promotion and protection of SRH-R issues. This is largely due to a complex system of social norms and values that inhibit the enforcement of policies and regulations that facilitate their implementation. Social norms and religious discourse are limiting SRH-R progress in a way that the community and the society at large still consider SRH-R a ‘taboo’. Thus, discussions about topic such as abortion, sexual identity and sex outside marriage are not open and need to be addressed at their root causes, by engaging all levels of the society, including households, community and religious leaders. Moreover, at institutional level, the lack of indicators to monitor the implementation of the SRH strategy, and the absence of specific budget allocated to SRH-R information and services make difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of the policies. In addition, there is the need to create an inclusive database that identifies gaps and opportunities for SRH-R improvements and collect disaggregated data about different rightsholder group’s needs. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The institutional landscape of SRH-R information and services in Jordan has shown weak legislation and programs that implement rights-based approach in the provision of SRH-R information and services. The lack of coordination between international donor organizations that finance SRH-R, including family planning programs, the absence of a unified official arm to coordinate and monitor the work of these organizations and the lack of SRH-R information systems in the country negatively affects the promotion and protection of SRH-R issues. This is largely due to a complex system of social norms and values that inhibit the enforcement of policies and regulations that facilitate their implementation. Social norms and religious discourse are limiting SRH-R progress in a way that the community and the society at large still consider SRH-R a ‘taboo’. Thus, discussions about topic such as abortion, sexual identity and sex outside marriage are not open and need to be addressed at their root causes, by engaging all levels of the society, including households, community and religious leaders. Moreover, at institutional level, the lack of indicators to monitor the implementation of the SRH strategy, and the absence of specific budget allocated to SRH-R information and services make difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of the policies. In addition, there is the need to create an inclusive database that identifies gaps and opportunities for SRH-R improvements and collect disaggregated data about different rightsholder group’s needs. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The institutional landscape of SRH-R information and services in Jordan has shown weak legislation and programs that implement rights-based approach in the provision of SRH-R information and services. The lack of coordination between international donor organizations that finance SRH-R, including family planning programs, the absence of a unified official arm to coordinate and monitor the work of these organizations and the lack of SRH-R information systems in the country negatively affects the promotion and protection of SRH-R issues. This is largely due to a complex system of social norms and values that inhibit the enforcement of policies and regulations that facilitate their implementation. Social norms and religious discourse are limiting SRH-R progress in a way that the community and the society at large still consider SRH-R a ‘taboo’. Thus, discussions about topic such as abortion, sexual identity and sex outside marriage are not open and need to be addressed at their root causes, by engaging all levels of the society, including households, community and religious leaders. Moreover, at institutional level, the lack of indicators to monitor the implementation of the SRH strategy, and the absence of specific budget allocated to SRH-R information and services make difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of the policies. In addition, there is the need to create an inclusive database that identifies gaps and opportunities for SRH-R improvements and collect disaggregated data about different rightsholder group’s needs. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The institutional landscape of SRH-R information and services in Jordan has shown weak legislation and programs that implement rights-based approach in the provision of SRH-R information and services. The lack of coordination between international donor organizations that finance SRH-R, including family planning programs, the absence of a unified official arm to coordinate and monitor the work of these organizations and the lack of SRH-R information systems in the country negatively affects the promotion and protection of SRH-R issues. This is largely due to a complex system of social norms and values that inhibit the enforcement of policies and regulations that facilitate their implementation. Social norms and religious discourse are limiting SRH-R progress in a way that the community and the society at large still consider SRH-R a ‘taboo’. Thus, discussions about topic such as abortion, sexual identity and sex outside marriage are not open and need to be addressed at their root causes, by engaging all levels of the society, including households, community and religious leaders. Moreover, at institutional level, the lack of indicators to monitor the implementation of the SRH strategy, and the absence of specific budget allocated to SRH-R information and services make difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of the policies. In addition, there is the need to create an inclusive database that identifies gaps and opportunities for SRH-R improvements and collect disaggregated data about different rightsholder group’s needs. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The institutional landscape of SRH-R information and services in Jordan has shown weak legislation and programs that implement rights-based approach in the provision of SRH-R information and services. The lack of coordination between international donor organizations that finance SRH-R, including family planning programs, the absence of a unified official arm to coordinate and monitor the work of these organizations and the lack of SRH-R information systems in the country negatively affects the promotion and protection of SRH-R issues. This is largely due to a complex system of social norms and values that inhibit the enforcement of policies and regulations that facilitate their implementation. Social norms and religious discourse are limiting SRH-R progress in a way that the community and the society at large still consider SRH-R a ‘taboo’. Thus, discussions about topic such as abortion, sexual identity and sex outside marriage are not open and need to be addressed at their root causes, by engaging all levels of the society, including households, community and religious leaders. Moreover, at institutional level, the lack of indicators to monitor the implementation of the SRH strategy, and the absence of specific budget allocated to SRH-R information and services make difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of the policies. In addition, there is the need to create an inclusive database that identifies gaps and opportunities for SRH-R improvements and collect disaggregated data about different rightsholder group’s needs. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The institutional landscape of SRH-R information and services in Jordan has shown weak legislation and programs that implement rights-based approach in the provision of SRH-R information and services. The lack of coordination between international donor organizations that finance SRH-R, including family planning programs, the absence of a unified official arm to coordinate and monitor the work of these organizations and the lack of SRH-R information systems in the country negatively affects the promotion and protection of SRH-R issues. This is largely due to a complex system of social norms and values that inhibit the enforcement of policies and regulations that facilitate their implementation. Social norms and religious discourse are limiting SRH-R progress in a way that the community and the society at large still consider SRH-R a ‘taboo’. Thus, discussions about topic such as abortion, sexual identity and sex outside marriage are not open and need to be addressed at their root causes, by engaging all levels of the society, including households, community and religious leaders. Moreover, at institutional level, the lack of indicators to monitor the implementation of the SRH strategy, and the absence of specific budget allocated to SRH-R information and services make difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of the policies. In addition, there is the need to create an inclusive database that identifies gaps and opportunities for SRH-R improvements and collect disaggregated data about different rightsholder group’s needs. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The institutional landscape of SRH-R information and services in Jordan has shown weak legislation and programs that implement rights-based approach in the provision of SRH-R information and services. The lack of coordination between international donor organizations that finance SRH-R, including family planning programs, the absence of a unified official arm to coordinate and monitor the work of these organizations and the lack of SRH-R information systems in the country negatively affects the promotion and protection of SRH-R issues. This is largely due to a complex system of social norms and values that inhibit the enforcement of policies and regulations that facilitate their implementation. Social norms and religious discourse are limiting SRH-R progress in a way that the community and the society at large still consider SRH-R a ‘taboo’. Thus, discussions about topic such as abortion, sexual identity and sex outside marriage are not open and need to be addressed at their root causes, by engaging all levels of the society, including households, community and religious leaders. Moreover, at institutional level, the lack of indicators to monitor the implementation of the SRH strategy, and the absence of specific budget allocated to SRH-R information and services make difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of the policies. In addition, there is the need to create an inclusive database that identifies gaps and opportunities for SRH-R improvements and collect disaggregated data about different rightsholder group’s needs. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead NA-NAMRA-04822224-WL-KE Positive Vibes Trust This acitvity focuses on supporting young women rightsholders to claim their sexual and reproductive health and rights The goal for this activity is by the end of 2025, have resilient young women who play a leading role in strengthened and inclusive organisations and movements that enjoy increased public support and have convinced duty-bearers and health-service providers to take steps towards implementing laws, policies and practices that respect and protect these young women’s SRH-R. The people we are targeting are young women with disabilities, living with HIV, affected by displacement and/or identifying as LBTI. Positive Vibes Positive Vibes Positive Vibes Trust info@positivevibes.org https://positivevibes.org 49 Pasteur Street, Windhoek, Namibia Namibia Kenya Reproductive health care 81603.31 133287.86 48290.86 53083.69 34784.5 8563.96 Expenditure Q1-Q2 21 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 86882.18 Expenditure Q3-Q4 21 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 82440.8 Expenditure Q1-Q2 22 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 41628.59 Expenditure Q3-Q4 22 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 46980.7 Expenditure Q1-Q2 23 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 41203.87 Expenditure Q3-Q4 23 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 34222.55 Expenditure Q1-Q2 24 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 30191.73 Expenditure Q3-Q4 24 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 18523.77 Expenditure Q1-Q2 25 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 42996.38 Expenditure Q3-Q4 25 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes A review of a recent analysis of policies and political contexts in Kenya determined that the level of political priority for adolescents’ and young women’s SRH-R is still low. Furthermore, the lack of detailed guidelines for programming and concerns from health care providers (HCPs) regarding the legal implications of providing SRH-R services to young people especially adolescent girls have continued to impede service access. Most of adolescent girls and young women’s health programmes including SRH-R are donor funded meaning they are still not a priority at the national and county levels. Sexuality and SRH-R of adolescents and young women living with disabilities are usually overlooked in policy making and program designs. This largely stems from the lack of existing nuanced and credible data .In order to increase political attention to adolescent girls’ and young women’s SRH-R in Kenya, there is an urgent need for policy actors to: 1) create a more cohesive community of advocates across sectors, 2) develop a clearer public positioning of adolescent SRH, 3) agree on a set of precise approaches that will resonate with the political system, and 4) identify and nurture policy entrepreneurs to facilitate the coupling of adolescent SRH with potential solutions when windows of opportunity arise. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead A review of a recent analysis of policies and political contexts in Kenya determined that the level of political priority for adolescents’ and young women’s SRH-R is still low. Furthermore, the lack of detailed guidelines for programming and concerns from health care providers (HCPs) regarding the legal implications of providing SRH-R services to young people especially adolescent girls have continued to impede service access. Most of adolescent girls and young women’s health programmes including SRH-R are donor funded meaning they are still not a priority at the national and county levels. Sexuality and SRH-R of adolescents and young women living with disabilities are usually overlooked in policy making and program designs. This largely stems from the lack of existing nuanced and credible data .In order to increase political attention to adolescent girls’ and young women’s SRH-R in Kenya, there is an urgent need for policy actors to: 1) create a more cohesive community of advocates across sectors, 2) develop a clearer public positioning of adolescent SRH, 3) agree on a set of precise approaches that will resonate with the political system, and 4) identify and nurture policy entrepreneurs to facilitate the coupling of adolescent SRH with potential solutions when windows of opportunity arise. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead A review of a recent analysis of policies and political contexts in Kenya determined that the level of political priority for adolescents’ and young women’s SRH-R is still low. Furthermore, the lack of detailed guidelines for programming and concerns from health care providers (HCPs) regarding the legal implications of providing SRH-R services to young people especially adolescent girls have continued to impede service access. Most of adolescent girls and young women’s health programmes including SRH-R are donor funded meaning they are still not a priority at the national and county levels. Sexuality and SRH-R of adolescents and young women living with disabilities are usually overlooked in policy making and program designs. This largely stems from the lack of existing nuanced and credible data .In order to increase political attention to adolescent girls’ and young women’s SRH-R in Kenya, there is an urgent need for policy actors to: 1) create a more cohesive community of advocates across sectors, 2) develop a clearer public positioning of adolescent SRH, 3) agree on a set of precise approaches that will resonate with the political system, and 4) identify and nurture policy entrepreneurs to facilitate the coupling of adolescent SRH with potential solutions when windows of opportunity arise. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead A review of a recent analysis of policies and political contexts in Kenya determined that the level of political priority for adolescents’ and young women’s SRH-R is still low. Furthermore, the lack of detailed guidelines for programming and concerns from health care providers (HCPs) regarding the legal implications of providing SRH-R services to young people especially adolescent girls have continued to impede service access. Most of adolescent girls and young women’s health programmes including SRH-R are donor funded meaning they are still not a priority at the national and county levels. Sexuality and SRH-R of adolescents and young women living with disabilities are usually overlooked in policy making and program designs. This largely stems from the lack of existing nuanced and credible data .In order to increase political attention to adolescent girls’ and young women’s SRH-R in Kenya, there is an urgent need for policy actors to: 1) create a more cohesive community of advocates across sectors, 2) develop a clearer public positioning of adolescent SRH, 3) agree on a set of precise approaches that will resonate with the political system, and 4) identify and nurture policy entrepreneurs to facilitate the coupling of adolescent SRH with potential solutions when windows of opportunity arise. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead A review of a recent analysis of policies and political contexts in Kenya determined that the level of political priority for adolescents’ and young women’s SRH-R is still low. Furthermore, the lack of detailed guidelines for programming and concerns from health care providers (HCPs) regarding the legal implications of providing SRH-R services to young people especially adolescent girls have continued to impede service access. Most of adolescent girls and young women’s health programmes including SRH-R are donor funded meaning they are still not a priority at the national and county levels. Sexuality and SRH-R of adolescents and young women living with disabilities are usually overlooked in policy making and program designs. This largely stems from the lack of existing nuanced and credible data .In order to increase political attention to adolescent girls’ and young women’s SRH-R in Kenya, there is an urgent need for policy actors to: 1) create a more cohesive community of advocates across sectors, 2) develop a clearer public positioning of adolescent SRH, 3) agree on a set of precise approaches that will resonate with the political system, and 4) identify and nurture policy entrepreneurs to facilitate the coupling of adolescent SRH with potential solutions when windows of opportunity arise. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead A review of a recent analysis of policies and political contexts in Kenya determined that the level of political priority for adolescents’ and young women’s SRH-R is still low. Furthermore, the lack of detailed guidelines for programming and concerns from health care providers (HCPs) regarding the legal implications of providing SRH-R services to young people especially adolescent girls have continued to impede service access. Most of adolescent girls and young women’s health programmes including SRH-R are donor funded meaning they are still not a priority at the national and county levels. Sexuality and SRH-R of adolescents and young women living with disabilities are usually overlooked in policy making and program designs. This largely stems from the lack of existing nuanced and credible data .In order to increase political attention to adolescent girls’ and young women’s SRH-R in Kenya, there is an urgent need for policy actors to: 1) create a more cohesive community of advocates across sectors, 2) develop a clearer public positioning of adolescent SRH, 3) agree on a set of precise approaches that will resonate with the political system, and 4) identify and nurture policy entrepreneurs to facilitate the coupling of adolescent SRH with potential solutions when windows of opportunity arise. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead A review of a recent analysis of policies and political contexts in Kenya determined that the level of political priority for adolescents’ and young women’s SRH-R is still low. Furthermore, the lack of detailed guidelines for programming and concerns from health care providers (HCPs) regarding the legal implications of providing SRH-R services to young people especially adolescent girls have continued to impede service access. Most of adolescent girls and young women’s health programmes including SRH-R are donor funded meaning they are still not a priority at the national and county levels. Sexuality and SRH-R of adolescents and young women living with disabilities are usually overlooked in policy making and program designs. This largely stems from the lack of existing nuanced and credible data .In order to increase political attention to adolescent girls’ and young women’s SRH-R in Kenya, there is an urgent need for policy actors to: 1) create a more cohesive community of advocates across sectors, 2) develop a clearer public positioning of adolescent SRH, 3) agree on a set of precise approaches that will resonate with the political system, and 4) identify and nurture policy entrepreneurs to facilitate the coupling of adolescent SRH with potential solutions when windows of opportunity arise. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead A review of a recent analysis of policies and political contexts in Kenya determined that the level of political priority for adolescents’ and young women’s SRH-R is still low. Furthermore, the lack of detailed guidelines for programming and concerns from health care providers (HCPs) regarding the legal implications of providing SRH-R services to young people especially adolescent girls have continued to impede service access. Most of adolescent girls and young women’s health programmes including SRH-R are donor funded meaning they are still not a priority at the national and county levels. Sexuality and SRH-R of adolescents and young women living with disabilities are usually overlooked in policy making and program designs. This largely stems from the lack of existing nuanced and credible data .In order to increase political attention to adolescent girls’ and young women’s SRH-R in Kenya, there is an urgent need for policy actors to: 1) create a more cohesive community of advocates across sectors, 2) develop a clearer public positioning of adolescent SRH, 3) agree on a set of precise approaches that will resonate with the political system, and 4) identify and nurture policy entrepreneurs to facilitate the coupling of adolescent SRH with potential solutions when windows of opportunity arise. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead A review of a recent analysis of policies and political contexts in Kenya determined that the level of political priority for adolescents’ and young women’s SRH-R is still low. Furthermore, the lack of detailed guidelines for programming and concerns from health care providers (HCPs) regarding the legal implications of providing SRH-R services to young people especially adolescent girls have continued to impede service access. Most of adolescent girls and young women’s health programmes including SRH-R are donor funded meaning they are still not a priority at the national and county levels. Sexuality and SRH-R of adolescents and young women living with disabilities are usually overlooked in policy making and program designs. This largely stems from the lack of existing nuanced and credible data .In order to increase political attention to adolescent girls’ and young women’s SRH-R in Kenya, there is an urgent need for policy actors to: 1) create a more cohesive community of advocates across sectors, 2) develop a clearer public positioning of adolescent SRH, 3) agree on a set of precise approaches that will resonate with the political system, and 4) identify and nurture policy entrepreneurs to facilitate the coupling of adolescent SRH with potential solutions when windows of opportunity arise. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead A review of a recent analysis of policies and political contexts in Kenya determined that the level of political priority for adolescents’ and young women’s SRH-R is still low. Furthermore, the lack of detailed guidelines for programming and concerns from health care providers (HCPs) regarding the legal implications of providing SRH-R services to young people especially adolescent girls have continued to impede service access. Most of adolescent girls and young women’s health programmes including SRH-R are donor funded meaning they are still not a priority at the national and county levels. Sexuality and SRH-R of adolescents and young women living with disabilities are usually overlooked in policy making and program designs. This largely stems from the lack of existing nuanced and credible data .In order to increase political attention to adolescent girls’ and young women’s SRH-R in Kenya, there is an urgent need for policy actors to: 1) create a more cohesive community of advocates across sectors, 2) develop a clearer public positioning of adolescent SRH, 3) agree on a set of precise approaches that will resonate with the political system, and 4) identify and nurture policy entrepreneurs to facilitate the coupling of adolescent SRH with potential solutions when windows of opportunity arise. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead NA-NAMRA-04822224-WL-LB Positive Vibes Trust This acitvity focuses on supporting young women rightsholders to claim their sexual and reproductive health and rights The goal for this activity is by the end of 2025, have resilient young women who play a leading role in strengthened and inclusive organisations and movements that enjoy increased public support and have convinced duty-bearers and health-service providers to take steps towards implementing laws, policies and practices that respect and protect these young women’s SRH-R. The people we are targeting are young women with disabilities, living with HIV, affected by displacement and/or identifying as LBTI. Positive Vibes Positive Vibes Positive Vibes Trust info@positivevibes.org https://positivevibes.org 49 Pasteur Street, Windhoek, Namibia Namibia Lebanon Reproductive health care 10139.93 85759.01 34223.99 10324.23 11272.27 3557.19 Expenditure Q1-Q2 21 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 3834.48 Expenditure Q3-Q4 21 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 3650.42 Expenditure Q1-Q2 22 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 5402.17 Expenditure Q3-Q4 22 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 16503.43 Expenditure Q1-Q2 23 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 13852.56 Expenditure Q3-Q4 23 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 6039.24 Expenditure Q1-Q2 24 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 9221.51 Expenditure Q3-Q4 24 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 4682.73 Expenditure Q1-Q2 25 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 16694.89 Expenditure Q3-Q4 25 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes The fact that abortion is still illegal, discrimination against LGBQTI community remains high and depends on an arbitrary interpretation of the criminal law and the fact that Lebanon has not ratified the Convention of the right of people with disability as well as the high discrimination against refugees, are just examples that give a clear picture of what is the current socio- political context in Lebanon. The assumptions “Conducive and supportive civic space for SRH-R inclusive policy making and review”, “Existence of an active legislative process around SRH issues”, “Recognition and prioritization of SRH-R laws and policies in by government actors”, “Leadership of RHs in the e policy-making arena around SRH-R issues”, “Willingness of duty-bearers to implement and monitor laws” and “Publication of research that informs SRH-R policy-making or reform” are not realistic considering the Lebanese sectarian and patriarchal system. Nonetheless, the need to change this reality is also high. Thus, strengthening participatory strategic engagement with policy makers by drafting policies brief developed in participatory and inclusive manners are essential tools in order to achieve some positive changes in the reality. In this sense, the criminalisation of harassment behaviours adopted with a decree in 2020, could be seen as a positive first step in this direction. Along the same line, advocacy and designing policy brief to tackle some of the laws mentioned above would be essential to improve gender equality and moving forward to a more social justice society. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The fact that abortion is still illegal, discrimination against LGBQTI community remains high and depends on an arbitrary interpretation of the criminal law and the fact that Lebanon has not ratified the Convention of the right of people with disability as well as the high discrimination against refugees, are just examples that give a clear picture of what is the current socio- political context in Lebanon. The assumptions “Conducive and supportive civic space for SRH-R inclusive policy making and review”, “Existence of an active legislative process around SRH issues”, “Recognition and prioritization of SRH-R laws and policies in by government actors”, “Leadership of RHs in the e policy-making arena around SRH-R issues”, “Willingness of duty-bearers to implement and monitor laws” and “Publication of research that informs SRH-R policy-making or reform” are not realistic considering the Lebanese sectarian and patriarchal system. Nonetheless, the need to change this reality is also high. Thus, strengthening participatory strategic engagement with policy makers by drafting policies brief developed in participatory and inclusive manners are essential tools in order to achieve some positive changes in the reality. In this sense, the criminalisation of harassment behaviours adopted with a decree in 2020, could be seen as a positive first step in this direction. Along the same line, advocacy and designing policy brief to tackle some of the laws mentioned above would be essential to improve gender equality and moving forward to a more social justice society. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The fact that abortion is still illegal, discrimination against LGBQTI community remains high and depends on an arbitrary interpretation of the criminal law and the fact that Lebanon has not ratified the Convention of the right of people with disability as well as the high discrimination against refugees, are just examples that give a clear picture of what is the current socio- political context in Lebanon. The assumptions “Conducive and supportive civic space for SRH-R inclusive policy making and review”, “Existence of an active legislative process around SRH issues”, “Recognition and prioritization of SRH-R laws and policies in by government actors”, “Leadership of RHs in the e policy-making arena around SRH-R issues”, “Willingness of duty-bearers to implement and monitor laws” and “Publication of research that informs SRH-R policy-making or reform” are not realistic considering the Lebanese sectarian and patriarchal system. Nonetheless, the need to change this reality is also high. Thus, strengthening participatory strategic engagement with policy makers by drafting policies brief developed in participatory and inclusive manners are essential tools in order to achieve some positive changes in the reality. In this sense, the criminalisation of harassment behaviours adopted with a decree in 2020, could be seen as a positive first step in this direction. Along the same line, advocacy and designing policy brief to tackle some of the laws mentioned above would be essential to improve gender equality and moving forward to a more social justice society. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The fact that abortion is still illegal, discrimination against LGBQTI community remains high and depends on an arbitrary interpretation of the criminal law and the fact that Lebanon has not ratified the Convention of the right of people with disability as well as the high discrimination against refugees, are just examples that give a clear picture of what is the current socio- political context in Lebanon. The assumptions “Conducive and supportive civic space for SRH-R inclusive policy making and review”, “Existence of an active legislative process around SRH issues”, “Recognition and prioritization of SRH-R laws and policies in by government actors”, “Leadership of RHs in the e policy-making arena around SRH-R issues”, “Willingness of duty-bearers to implement and monitor laws” and “Publication of research that informs SRH-R policy-making or reform” are not realistic considering the Lebanese sectarian and patriarchal system. Nonetheless, the need to change this reality is also high. Thus, strengthening participatory strategic engagement with policy makers by drafting policies brief developed in participatory and inclusive manners are essential tools in order to achieve some positive changes in the reality. In this sense, the criminalisation of harassment behaviours adopted with a decree in 2020, could be seen as a positive first step in this direction. Along the same line, advocacy and designing policy brief to tackle some of the laws mentioned above would be essential to improve gender equality and moving forward to a more social justice society. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The fact that abortion is still illegal, discrimination against LGBQTI community remains high and depends on an arbitrary interpretation of the criminal law and the fact that Lebanon has not ratified the Convention of the right of people with disability as well as the high discrimination against refugees, are just examples that give a clear picture of what is the current socio- political context in Lebanon. The assumptions “Conducive and supportive civic space for SRH-R inclusive policy making and review”, “Existence of an active legislative process around SRH issues”, “Recognition and prioritization of SRH-R laws and policies in by government actors”, “Leadership of RHs in the e policy-making arena around SRH-R issues”, “Willingness of duty-bearers to implement and monitor laws” and “Publication of research that informs SRH-R policy-making or reform” are not realistic considering the Lebanese sectarian and patriarchal system. Nonetheless, the need to change this reality is also high. Thus, strengthening participatory strategic engagement with policy makers by drafting policies brief developed in participatory and inclusive manners are essential tools in order to achieve some positive changes in the reality. In this sense, the criminalisation of harassment behaviours adopted with a decree in 2020, could be seen as a positive first step in this direction. Along the same line, advocacy and designing policy brief to tackle some of the laws mentioned above would be essential to improve gender equality and moving forward to a more social justice society. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The fact that abortion is still illegal, discrimination against LGBQTI community remains high and depends on an arbitrary interpretation of the criminal law and the fact that Lebanon has not ratified the Convention of the right of people with disability as well as the high discrimination against refugees, are just examples that give a clear picture of what is the current socio- political context in Lebanon. The assumptions “Conducive and supportive civic space for SRH-R inclusive policy making and review”, “Existence of an active legislative process around SRH issues”, “Recognition and prioritization of SRH-R laws and policies in by government actors”, “Leadership of RHs in the e policy-making arena around SRH-R issues”, “Willingness of duty-bearers to implement and monitor laws” and “Publication of research that informs SRH-R policy-making or reform” are not realistic considering the Lebanese sectarian and patriarchal system. Nonetheless, the need to change this reality is also high. Thus, strengthening participatory strategic engagement with policy makers by drafting policies brief developed in participatory and inclusive manners are essential tools in order to achieve some positive changes in the reality. In this sense, the criminalisation of harassment behaviours adopted with a decree in 2020, could be seen as a positive first step in this direction. Along the same line, advocacy and designing policy brief to tackle some of the laws mentioned above would be essential to improve gender equality and moving forward to a more social justice society. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The fact that abortion is still illegal, discrimination against LGBQTI community remains high and depends on an arbitrary interpretation of the criminal law and the fact that Lebanon has not ratified the Convention of the right of people with disability as well as the high discrimination against refugees, are just examples that give a clear picture of what is the current socio- political context in Lebanon. The assumptions “Conducive and supportive civic space for SRH-R inclusive policy making and review”, “Existence of an active legislative process around SRH issues”, “Recognition and prioritization of SRH-R laws and policies in by government actors”, “Leadership of RHs in the e policy-making arena around SRH-R issues”, “Willingness of duty-bearers to implement and monitor laws” and “Publication of research that informs SRH-R policy-making or reform” are not realistic considering the Lebanese sectarian and patriarchal system. Nonetheless, the need to change this reality is also high. Thus, strengthening participatory strategic engagement with policy makers by drafting policies brief developed in participatory and inclusive manners are essential tools in order to achieve some positive changes in the reality. In this sense, the criminalisation of harassment behaviours adopted with a decree in 2020, could be seen as a positive first step in this direction. Along the same line, advocacy and designing policy brief to tackle some of the laws mentioned above would be essential to improve gender equality and moving forward to a more social justice society. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The fact that abortion is still illegal, discrimination against LGBQTI community remains high and depends on an arbitrary interpretation of the criminal law and the fact that Lebanon has not ratified the Convention of the right of people with disability as well as the high discrimination against refugees, are just examples that give a clear picture of what is the current socio- political context in Lebanon. The assumptions “Conducive and supportive civic space for SRH-R inclusive policy making and review”, “Existence of an active legislative process around SRH issues”, “Recognition and prioritization of SRH-R laws and policies in by government actors”, “Leadership of RHs in the e policy-making arena around SRH-R issues”, “Willingness of duty-bearers to implement and monitor laws” and “Publication of research that informs SRH-R policy-making or reform” are not realistic considering the Lebanese sectarian and patriarchal system. Nonetheless, the need to change this reality is also high. Thus, strengthening participatory strategic engagement with policy makers by drafting policies brief developed in participatory and inclusive manners are essential tools in order to achieve some positive changes in the reality. In this sense, the criminalisation of harassment behaviours adopted with a decree in 2020, could be seen as a positive first step in this direction. Along the same line, advocacy and designing policy brief to tackle some of the laws mentioned above would be essential to improve gender equality and moving forward to a more social justice society. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The fact that abortion is still illegal, discrimination against LGBQTI community remains high and depends on an arbitrary interpretation of the criminal law and the fact that Lebanon has not ratified the Convention of the right of people with disability as well as the high discrimination against refugees, are just examples that give a clear picture of what is the current socio- political context in Lebanon. The assumptions “Conducive and supportive civic space for SRH-R inclusive policy making and review”, “Existence of an active legislative process around SRH issues”, “Recognition and prioritization of SRH-R laws and policies in by government actors”, “Leadership of RHs in the e policy-making arena around SRH-R issues”, “Willingness of duty-bearers to implement and monitor laws” and “Publication of research that informs SRH-R policy-making or reform” are not realistic considering the Lebanese sectarian and patriarchal system. Nonetheless, the need to change this reality is also high. Thus, strengthening participatory strategic engagement with policy makers by drafting policies brief developed in participatory and inclusive manners are essential tools in order to achieve some positive changes in the reality. In this sense, the criminalisation of harassment behaviours adopted with a decree in 2020, could be seen as a positive first step in this direction. Along the same line, advocacy and designing policy brief to tackle some of the laws mentioned above would be essential to improve gender equality and moving forward to a more social justice society. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The fact that abortion is still illegal, discrimination against LGBQTI community remains high and depends on an arbitrary interpretation of the criminal law and the fact that Lebanon has not ratified the Convention of the right of people with disability as well as the high discrimination against refugees, are just examples that give a clear picture of what is the current socio- political context in Lebanon. The assumptions “Conducive and supportive civic space for SRH-R inclusive policy making and review”, “Existence of an active legislative process around SRH issues”, “Recognition and prioritization of SRH-R laws and policies in by government actors”, “Leadership of RHs in the e policy-making arena around SRH-R issues”, “Willingness of duty-bearers to implement and monitor laws” and “Publication of research that informs SRH-R policy-making or reform” are not realistic considering the Lebanese sectarian and patriarchal system. Nonetheless, the need to change this reality is also high. Thus, strengthening participatory strategic engagement with policy makers by drafting policies brief developed in participatory and inclusive manners are essential tools in order to achieve some positive changes in the reality. In this sense, the criminalisation of harassment behaviours adopted with a decree in 2020, could be seen as a positive first step in this direction. Along the same line, advocacy and designing policy brief to tackle some of the laws mentioned above would be essential to improve gender equality and moving forward to a more social justice society. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead NA-NAMRA-04822224-WL-MZ Positive Vibes Trust This acitvity focuses on supporting young women rightsholders to claim their sexual and reproductive health and rights The goal for this activity is by the end of 2025, have resilient young women who play a leading role in strengthened and inclusive organisations and movements that enjoy increased public support and have convinced duty-bearers and health-service providers to take steps towards implementing laws, policies and practices that respect and protect these young women’s SRH-R. The people we are targeting are young women with disabilities, living with HIV, affected by displacement and/or identifying as LBTI. Positive Vibes Positive Vibes Positive Vibes Trust info@positivevibes.org https://positivevibes.org 49 Pasteur Street, Windhoek, Namibia Namibia Mozambique Reproductive health care 81600.6 133287.86 48290.86 53083.69 34784.5 8563.96 Expenditure Q1-Q2 21 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 45958.25 Expenditure Q3-Q4 21 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 14276.21 Expenditure Q1-Q2 22 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 45124.39 Expenditure Q3-Q4 22 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 26146.51 Expenditure Q1-Q2 23 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 45722.31 Expenditure Q3-Q4 23 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 19012.89 Expenditure Q1-Q2 24 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 29042.07 Expenditure Q3-Q4 24 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 17990.11 Expenditure Q1-Q2 25 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 41606.17 Expenditure Q3-Q4 25 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes The laws, regulations, and policies on SRHR in Mozambique are conducive to protecting women, young women, women living with HIV and women with disability. In addition, the country's Constitution, which in its article 35 prohibits discrimination based on gender, Mozambique has made significant strides in protecting women's rights. It is a signatory of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1997) the Maputo Protocol (2015). Also, it has decriminalized abortion (2014), it has adopted a Strategy for Gender Equality (2018), and most recently, it has revoked the ministerial decree which banned pregnant adolescents from attending day classes (December 2018). However, conservative social norms regarding gender roles and sexuality, coupled with the lack of political will to tackle them, have contributed negatively to the fullest implementation of such progressive pieces of legislation and policies. For instance, LBQ women are not included in many women's policies, exposing them to abuse, harassment by private and state actors, and lack adequate SRH services. To exemplify the above, in 2011, the MoH (Ministry of Health) approved the National Policy of Sexual and Reproductive rights, with the intent to provide friendly SRH services to all without stigma and discrimination; however, the reality shows a different story. PWD, PLHIV and LBQ report being discriminated and stigmatized against by health care providers when seeking services. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The laws, regulations, and policies on SRHR in Mozambique are conducive to protecting women, young women, women living with HIV and women with disability. In addition, the country's Constitution, which in its article 35 prohibits discrimination based on gender, Mozambique has made significant strides in protecting women's rights. It is a signatory of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1997) the Maputo Protocol (2015). Also, it has decriminalized abortion (2014), it has adopted a Strategy for Gender Equality (2018), and most recently, it has revoked the ministerial decree which banned pregnant adolescents from attending day classes (December 2018). However, conservative social norms regarding gender roles and sexuality, coupled with the lack of political will to tackle them, have contributed negatively to the fullest implementation of such progressive pieces of legislation and policies. For instance, LBQ women are not included in many women's policies, exposing them to abuse, harassment by private and state actors, and lack adequate SRH services. To exemplify the above, in 2011, the MoH (Ministry of Health) approved the National Policy of Sexual and Reproductive rights, with the intent to provide friendly SRH services to all without stigma and discrimination; however, the reality shows a different story. PWD, PLHIV and LBQ report being discriminated and stigmatized against by health care providers when seeking services. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The laws, regulations, and policies on SRHR in Mozambique are conducive to protecting women, young women, women living with HIV and women with disability. In addition, the country's Constitution, which in its article 35 prohibits discrimination based on gender, Mozambique has made significant strides in protecting women's rights. It is a signatory of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1997) the Maputo Protocol (2015). Also, it has decriminalized abortion (2014), it has adopted a Strategy for Gender Equality (2018), and most recently, it has revoked the ministerial decree which banned pregnant adolescents from attending day classes (December 2018). However, conservative social norms regarding gender roles and sexuality, coupled with the lack of political will to tackle them, have contributed negatively to the fullest implementation of such progressive pieces of legislation and policies. For instance, LBQ women are not included in many women's policies, exposing them to abuse, harassment by private and state actors, and lack adequate SRH services. To exemplify the above, in 2011, the MoH (Ministry of Health) approved the National Policy of Sexual and Reproductive rights, with the intent to provide friendly SRH services to all without stigma and discrimination; however, the reality shows a different story. PWD, PLHIV and LBQ report being discriminated and stigmatized against by health care providers when seeking services. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The laws, regulations, and policies on SRHR in Mozambique are conducive to protecting women, young women, women living with HIV and women with disability. In addition, the country's Constitution, which in its article 35 prohibits discrimination based on gender, Mozambique has made significant strides in protecting women's rights. It is a signatory of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1997) the Maputo Protocol (2015). Also, it has decriminalized abortion (2014), it has adopted a Strategy for Gender Equality (2018), and most recently, it has revoked the ministerial decree which banned pregnant adolescents from attending day classes (December 2018). However, conservative social norms regarding gender roles and sexuality, coupled with the lack of political will to tackle them, have contributed negatively to the fullest implementation of such progressive pieces of legislation and policies. For instance, LBQ women are not included in many women's policies, exposing them to abuse, harassment by private and state actors, and lack adequate SRH services. To exemplify the above, in 2011, the MoH (Ministry of Health) approved the National Policy of Sexual and Reproductive rights, with the intent to provide friendly SRH services to all without stigma and discrimination; however, the reality shows a different story. PWD, PLHIV and LBQ report being discriminated and stigmatized against by health care providers when seeking services. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The laws, regulations, and policies on SRHR in Mozambique are conducive to protecting women, young women, women living with HIV and women with disability. In addition, the country's Constitution, which in its article 35 prohibits discrimination based on gender, Mozambique has made significant strides in protecting women's rights. It is a signatory of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1997) the Maputo Protocol (2015). Also, it has decriminalized abortion (2014), it has adopted a Strategy for Gender Equality (2018), and most recently, it has revoked the ministerial decree which banned pregnant adolescents from attending day classes (December 2018). However, conservative social norms regarding gender roles and sexuality, coupled with the lack of political will to tackle them, have contributed negatively to the fullest implementation of such progressive pieces of legislation and policies. For instance, LBQ women are not included in many women's policies, exposing them to abuse, harassment by private and state actors, and lack adequate SRH services. To exemplify the above, in 2011, the MoH (Ministry of Health) approved the National Policy of Sexual and Reproductive rights, with the intent to provide friendly SRH services to all without stigma and discrimination; however, the reality shows a different story. PWD, PLHIV and LBQ report being discriminated and stigmatized against by health care providers when seeking services. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The laws, regulations, and policies on SRHR in Mozambique are conducive to protecting women, young women, women living with HIV and women with disability. In addition, the country's Constitution, which in its article 35 prohibits discrimination based on gender, Mozambique has made significant strides in protecting women's rights. It is a signatory of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1997) the Maputo Protocol (2015). Also, it has decriminalized abortion (2014), it has adopted a Strategy for Gender Equality (2018), and most recently, it has revoked the ministerial decree which banned pregnant adolescents from attending day classes (December 2018). However, conservative social norms regarding gender roles and sexuality, coupled with the lack of political will to tackle them, have contributed negatively to the fullest implementation of such progressive pieces of legislation and policies. For instance, LBQ women are not included in many women's policies, exposing them to abuse, harassment by private and state actors, and lack adequate SRH services. To exemplify the above, in 2011, the MoH (Ministry of Health) approved the National Policy of Sexual and Reproductive rights, with the intent to provide friendly SRH services to all without stigma and discrimination; however, the reality shows a different story. PWD, PLHIV and LBQ report being discriminated and stigmatized against by health care providers when seeking services. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The laws, regulations, and policies on SRHR in Mozambique are conducive to protecting women, young women, women living with HIV and women with disability. In addition, the country's Constitution, which in its article 35 prohibits discrimination based on gender, Mozambique has made significant strides in protecting women's rights. It is a signatory of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1997) the Maputo Protocol (2015). Also, it has decriminalized abortion (2014), it has adopted a Strategy for Gender Equality (2018), and most recently, it has revoked the ministerial decree which banned pregnant adolescents from attending day classes (December 2018). However, conservative social norms regarding gender roles and sexuality, coupled with the lack of political will to tackle them, have contributed negatively to the fullest implementation of such progressive pieces of legislation and policies. For instance, LBQ women are not included in many women's policies, exposing them to abuse, harassment by private and state actors, and lack adequate SRH services. To exemplify the above, in 2011, the MoH (Ministry of Health) approved the National Policy of Sexual and Reproductive rights, with the intent to provide friendly SRH services to all without stigma and discrimination; however, the reality shows a different story. PWD, PLHIV and LBQ report being discriminated and stigmatized against by health care providers when seeking services. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The laws, regulations, and policies on SRHR in Mozambique are conducive to protecting women, young women, women living with HIV and women with disability. In addition, the country's Constitution, which in its article 35 prohibits discrimination based on gender, Mozambique has made significant strides in protecting women's rights. It is a signatory of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1997) the Maputo Protocol (2015). Also, it has decriminalized abortion (2014), it has adopted a Strategy for Gender Equality (2018), and most recently, it has revoked the ministerial decree which banned pregnant adolescents from attending day classes (December 2018). However, conservative social norms regarding gender roles and sexuality, coupled with the lack of political will to tackle them, have contributed negatively to the fullest implementation of such progressive pieces of legislation and policies. For instance, LBQ women are not included in many women's policies, exposing them to abuse, harassment by private and state actors, and lack adequate SRH services. To exemplify the above, in 2011, the MoH (Ministry of Health) approved the National Policy of Sexual and Reproductive rights, with the intent to provide friendly SRH services to all without stigma and discrimination; however, the reality shows a different story. PWD, PLHIV and LBQ report being discriminated and stigmatized against by health care providers when seeking services. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The laws, regulations, and policies on SRHR in Mozambique are conducive to protecting women, young women, women living with HIV and women with disability. In addition, the country's Constitution, which in its article 35 prohibits discrimination based on gender, Mozambique has made significant strides in protecting women's rights. It is a signatory of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1997) the Maputo Protocol (2015). Also, it has decriminalized abortion (2014), it has adopted a Strategy for Gender Equality (2018), and most recently, it has revoked the ministerial decree which banned pregnant adolescents from attending day classes (December 2018). However, conservative social norms regarding gender roles and sexuality, coupled with the lack of political will to tackle them, have contributed negatively to the fullest implementation of such progressive pieces of legislation and policies. For instance, LBQ women are not included in many women's policies, exposing them to abuse, harassment by private and state actors, and lack adequate SRH services. To exemplify the above, in 2011, the MoH (Ministry of Health) approved the National Policy of Sexual and Reproductive rights, with the intent to provide friendly SRH services to all without stigma and discrimination; however, the reality shows a different story. PWD, PLHIV and LBQ report being discriminated and stigmatized against by health care providers when seeking services. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The laws, regulations, and policies on SRHR in Mozambique are conducive to protecting women, young women, women living with HIV and women with disability. In addition, the country's Constitution, which in its article 35 prohibits discrimination based on gender, Mozambique has made significant strides in protecting women's rights. It is a signatory of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1997) the Maputo Protocol (2015). Also, it has decriminalized abortion (2014), it has adopted a Strategy for Gender Equality (2018), and most recently, it has revoked the ministerial decree which banned pregnant adolescents from attending day classes (December 2018). However, conservative social norms regarding gender roles and sexuality, coupled with the lack of political will to tackle them, have contributed negatively to the fullest implementation of such progressive pieces of legislation and policies. For instance, LBQ women are not included in many women's policies, exposing them to abuse, harassment by private and state actors, and lack adequate SRH services. To exemplify the above, in 2011, the MoH (Ministry of Health) approved the National Policy of Sexual and Reproductive rights, with the intent to provide friendly SRH services to all without stigma and discrimination; however, the reality shows a different story. PWD, PLHIV and LBQ report being discriminated and stigmatized against by health care providers when seeking services. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead NA-NAMRA-04822224-WL-NE Positive Vibes Trust This acitvity focuses on supporting young women rightsholders to claim their sexual and reproductive health and rights The goal for this activity is by the end of 2025, have resilient young women who play a leading role in strengthened and inclusive organisations and movements that enjoy increased public support and have convinced duty-bearers and health-service providers to take steps towards implementing laws, policies and practices that respect and protect these young women’s SRH-R. The people we are targeting are young women with disabilities, living with HIV, affected by displacement and/or identifying as LBTI. Positive Vibes Positive Vibes Positive Vibes Trust info@positivevibes.org https://positivevibes.org 49 Pasteur Street, Windhoek, Namibia Namibia Niger Reproductive health care 81600.6 133287.86 48290.86 53083.69 34784.5 8563.96 Expenditure Q1-Q2 21 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 16405.12 Expenditure Q3-Q4 21 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 10951.26 Expenditure Q1-Q2 22 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 55172.44 Expenditure Q3-Q4 22 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 15935.6 Expenditure Q1-Q2 23 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 22463.63 Expenditure Q3-Q4 23 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 29947.02 Expenditure Q1-Q2 24 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 49380.93 Expenditure Q3-Q4 24 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 17990.11 Expenditure Q1-Q2 25 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 42307.3 Expenditure Q3-Q4 25 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes All laws and policies that respect and protect the SRHR of young women in Niger are rooted in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. We can cite among others the decree of laws to keep girls in school until the age of 16 of 2016 and the international convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (notably in its article 30) and its optional protocol ratified by Niger on June 08, 2008. However, the problem is far from the existence of policies and laws. It is mainly a problem of implementation and popularization in Niger. Given the context of the country, the authorities even dodge certain debates on some of these laws. This favours the lack of knowledge and competence of the substance of certain laws. This also has consequences for the provision of SRH services. According to one respondent, "the poor SRH service in the health services is the result of a lack of knowledge of the texts by health workers or a refusal to apply them. According to another respondent, the SRH of disabled persons is not respected because the great majority do not know the laws. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead All laws and policies that respect and protect the SRHR of young women in Niger are rooted in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. We can cite among others the decree of laws to keep girls in school until the age of 16 of 2016 and the international convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (notably in its article 30) and its optional protocol ratified by Niger on June 08, 2008. However, the problem is far from the existence of policies and laws. It is mainly a problem of implementation and popularization in Niger. Given the context of the country, the authorities even dodge certain debates on some of these laws. This favours the lack of knowledge and competence of the substance of certain laws. This also has consequences for the provision of SRH services. According to one respondent, "the poor SRH service in the health services is the result of a lack of knowledge of the texts by health workers or a refusal to apply them. According to another respondent, the SRH of disabled persons is not respected because the great majority do not know the laws. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead All laws and policies that respect and protect the SRHR of young women in Niger are rooted in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. We can cite among others the decree of laws to keep girls in school until the age of 16 of 2016 and the international convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (notably in its article 30) and its optional protocol ratified by Niger on June 08, 2008. However, the problem is far from the existence of policies and laws. It is mainly a problem of implementation and popularization in Niger. Given the context of the country, the authorities even dodge certain debates on some of these laws. This favours the lack of knowledge and competence of the substance of certain laws. This also has consequences for the provision of SRH services. According to one respondent, "the poor SRH service in the health services is the result of a lack of knowledge of the texts by health workers or a refusal to apply them. According to another respondent, the SRH of disabled persons is not respected because the great majority do not know the laws. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead All laws and policies that respect and protect the SRHR of young women in Niger are rooted in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. We can cite among others the decree of laws to keep girls in school until the age of 16 of 2016 and the international convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (notably in its article 30) and its optional protocol ratified by Niger on June 08, 2008. However, the problem is far from the existence of policies and laws. It is mainly a problem of implementation and popularization in Niger. Given the context of the country, the authorities even dodge certain debates on some of these laws. This favours the lack of knowledge and competence of the substance of certain laws. This also has consequences for the provision of SRH services. According to one respondent, "the poor SRH service in the health services is the result of a lack of knowledge of the texts by health workers or a refusal to apply them. According to another respondent, the SRH of disabled persons is not respected because the great majority do not know the laws. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead All laws and policies that respect and protect the SRHR of young women in Niger are rooted in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. We can cite among others the decree of laws to keep girls in school until the age of 16 of 2016 and the international convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (notably in its article 30) and its optional protocol ratified by Niger on June 08, 2008. However, the problem is far from the existence of policies and laws. It is mainly a problem of implementation and popularization in Niger. Given the context of the country, the authorities even dodge certain debates on some of these laws. This favours the lack of knowledge and competence of the substance of certain laws. This also has consequences for the provision of SRH services. According to one respondent, "the poor SRH service in the health services is the result of a lack of knowledge of the texts by health workers or a refusal to apply them. According to another respondent, the SRH of disabled persons is not respected because the great majority do not know the laws. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead All laws and policies that respect and protect the SRHR of young women in Niger are rooted in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. We can cite among others the decree of laws to keep girls in school until the age of 16 of 2016 and the international convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (notably in its article 30) and its optional protocol ratified by Niger on June 08, 2008. However, the problem is far from the existence of policies and laws. It is mainly a problem of implementation and popularization in Niger. Given the context of the country, the authorities even dodge certain debates on some of these laws. This favours the lack of knowledge and competence of the substance of certain laws. This also has consequences for the provision of SRH services. According to one respondent, "the poor SRH service in the health services is the result of a lack of knowledge of the texts by health workers or a refusal to apply them. According to another respondent, the SRH of disabled persons is not respected because the great majority do not know the laws. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead All laws and policies that respect and protect the SRHR of young women in Niger are rooted in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. We can cite among others the decree of laws to keep girls in school until the age of 16 of 2016 and the international convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (notably in its article 30) and its optional protocol ratified by Niger on June 08, 2008. However, the problem is far from the existence of policies and laws. It is mainly a problem of implementation and popularization in Niger. Given the context of the country, the authorities even dodge certain debates on some of these laws. This favours the lack of knowledge and competence of the substance of certain laws. This also has consequences for the provision of SRH services. According to one respondent, "the poor SRH service in the health services is the result of a lack of knowledge of the texts by health workers or a refusal to apply them. According to another respondent, the SRH of disabled persons is not respected because the great majority do not know the laws. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead All laws and policies that respect and protect the SRHR of young women in Niger are rooted in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. We can cite among others the decree of laws to keep girls in school until the age of 16 of 2016 and the international convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (notably in its article 30) and its optional protocol ratified by Niger on June 08, 2008. However, the problem is far from the existence of policies and laws. It is mainly a problem of implementation and popularization in Niger. Given the context of the country, the authorities even dodge certain debates on some of these laws. This favours the lack of knowledge and competence of the substance of certain laws. This also has consequences for the provision of SRH services. According to one respondent, "the poor SRH service in the health services is the result of a lack of knowledge of the texts by health workers or a refusal to apply them. According to another respondent, the SRH of disabled persons is not respected because the great majority do not know the laws. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead All laws and policies that respect and protect the SRHR of young women in Niger are rooted in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. We can cite among others the decree of laws to keep girls in school until the age of 16 of 2016 and the international convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (notably in its article 30) and its optional protocol ratified by Niger on June 08, 2008. However, the problem is far from the existence of policies and laws. It is mainly a problem of implementation and popularization in Niger. Given the context of the country, the authorities even dodge certain debates on some of these laws. This favours the lack of knowledge and competence of the substance of certain laws. This also has consequences for the provision of SRH services. According to one respondent, "the poor SRH service in the health services is the result of a lack of knowledge of the texts by health workers or a refusal to apply them. According to another respondent, the SRH of disabled persons is not respected because the great majority do not know the laws. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead All laws and policies that respect and protect the SRHR of young women in Niger are rooted in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. We can cite among others the decree of laws to keep girls in school until the age of 16 of 2016 and the international convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (notably in its article 30) and its optional protocol ratified by Niger on June 08, 2008. However, the problem is far from the existence of policies and laws. It is mainly a problem of implementation and popularization in Niger. Given the context of the country, the authorities even dodge certain debates on some of these laws. This favours the lack of knowledge and competence of the substance of certain laws. This also has consequences for the provision of SRH services. According to one respondent, "the poor SRH service in the health services is the result of a lack of knowledge of the texts by health workers or a refusal to apply them. According to another respondent, the SRH of disabled persons is not respected because the great majority do not know the laws. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead NA-NAMRA-04822224-WL-NG Positive Vibes Trust This acitvity focuses on supporting young women rightsholders to claim their sexual and reproductive health and rights The goal for this activity is by the end of 2025, have resilient young women who play a leading role in strengthened and inclusive organisations and movements that enjoy increased public support and have convinced duty-bearers and health-service providers to take steps towards implementing laws, policies and practices that respect and protect these young women’s SRH-R. The people we are targeting are young women with disabilities, living with HIV, affected by displacement and/or identifying as LBTI. Positive Vibes Positive Vibes Positive Vibes Trust info@positivevibes.org https://positivevibes.org 49 Pasteur Street, Windhoek, Namibia Namibia Nigeria Reproductive health care 81600.6 133287.86 48290.86 53083.69 34784.5 8563.96 Expenditure Q1-Q2 21 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 38894.99 Expenditure Q3-Q4 21 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 60538.35 Expenditure Q1-Q2 22 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 27840.85 Expenditure Q3-Q4 22 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 56610.74 Expenditure Q1-Q2 23 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 32758.09 Expenditure Q3-Q4 23 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 37411.83 Expenditure Q1-Q2 24 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 39749.02 Expenditure Q3-Q4 24 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 19710.38 Expenditure Q1-Q2 25 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 44027.56 Expenditure Q3-Q4 25 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes The Factors that influence compliance and improvement of the SRHR regulations include lack of political will, corruption, unstable political landscape, election violence, non-prioritisation of SRHR, limited platforms for inclusion in decision making spaces among others. On access to spaces, it was noted that LBTQI women have indirect access to national and direct access to international spaces. Women who are affected by displacement do not have access to national and international advocacy spaces. Persons with disabilities have limited access to national and international advocacy spaces. Other rightsholders such as women living with HIV have access to national and international spaces. On the experience of rights holders in the development and promotion of laws and public policies, participants revealed that rights holders are often excluded from decision making spaces. Bureaucratic bottlenecks in institutions that develop and implement policies, inadequate mentorship and capacity were identified as factors that limit the experience of right holders. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The Factors that influence compliance and improvement of the SRHR regulations include lack of political will, corruption, unstable political landscape, election violence, non-prioritisation of SRHR, limited platforms for inclusion in decision making spaces among others. On access to spaces, it was noted that LBTQI women have indirect access to national and direct access to international spaces. Women who are affected by displacement do not have access to national and international advocacy spaces. Persons with disabilities have limited access to national and international advocacy spaces. Other rightsholders such as women living with HIV have access to national and international spaces. On the experience of rights holders in the development and promotion of laws and public policies, participants revealed that rights holders are often excluded from decision making spaces. Bureaucratic bottlenecks in institutions that develop and implement policies, inadequate mentorship and capacity were identified as factors that limit the experience of right holders. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The Factors that influence compliance and improvement of the SRHR regulations include lack of political will, corruption, unstable political landscape, election violence, non-prioritisation of SRHR, limited platforms for inclusion in decision making spaces among others. On access to spaces, it was noted that LBTQI women have indirect access to national and direct access to international spaces. Women who are affected by displacement do not have access to national and international advocacy spaces. Persons with disabilities have limited access to national and international advocacy spaces. Other rightsholders such as women living with HIV have access to national and international spaces. On the experience of rights holders in the development and promotion of laws and public policies, participants revealed that rights holders are often excluded from decision making spaces. Bureaucratic bottlenecks in institutions that develop and implement policies, inadequate mentorship and capacity were identified as factors that limit the experience of right holders. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The Factors that influence compliance and improvement of the SRHR regulations include lack of political will, corruption, unstable political landscape, election violence, non-prioritisation of SRHR, limited platforms for inclusion in decision making spaces among others. On access to spaces, it was noted that LBTQI women have indirect access to national and direct access to international spaces. Women who are affected by displacement do not have access to national and international advocacy spaces. Persons with disabilities have limited access to national and international advocacy spaces. Other rightsholders such as women living with HIV have access to national and international spaces. On the experience of rights holders in the development and promotion of laws and public policies, participants revealed that rights holders are often excluded from decision making spaces. Bureaucratic bottlenecks in institutions that develop and implement policies, inadequate mentorship and capacity were identified as factors that limit the experience of right holders. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The Factors that influence compliance and improvement of the SRHR regulations include lack of political will, corruption, unstable political landscape, election violence, non-prioritisation of SRHR, limited platforms for inclusion in decision making spaces among others. On access to spaces, it was noted that LBTQI women have indirect access to national and direct access to international spaces. Women who are affected by displacement do not have access to national and international advocacy spaces. Persons with disabilities have limited access to national and international advocacy spaces. Other rightsholders such as women living with HIV have access to national and international spaces. On the experience of rights holders in the development and promotion of laws and public policies, participants revealed that rights holders are often excluded from decision making spaces. Bureaucratic bottlenecks in institutions that develop and implement policies, inadequate mentorship and capacity were identified as factors that limit the experience of right holders. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The Factors that influence compliance and improvement of the SRHR regulations include lack of political will, corruption, unstable political landscape, election violence, non-prioritisation of SRHR, limited platforms for inclusion in decision making spaces among others. On access to spaces, it was noted that LBTQI women have indirect access to national and direct access to international spaces. Women who are affected by displacement do not have access to national and international advocacy spaces. Persons with disabilities have limited access to national and international advocacy spaces. Other rightsholders such as women living with HIV have access to national and international spaces. On the experience of rights holders in the development and promotion of laws and public policies, participants revealed that rights holders are often excluded from decision making spaces. Bureaucratic bottlenecks in institutions that develop and implement policies, inadequate mentorship and capacity were identified as factors that limit the experience of right holders. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The Factors that influence compliance and improvement of the SRHR regulations include lack of political will, corruption, unstable political landscape, election violence, non-prioritisation of SRHR, limited platforms for inclusion in decision making spaces among others. On access to spaces, it was noted that LBTQI women have indirect access to national and direct access to international spaces. Women who are affected by displacement do not have access to national and international advocacy spaces. Persons with disabilities have limited access to national and international advocacy spaces. Other rightsholders such as women living with HIV have access to national and international spaces. On the experience of rights holders in the development and promotion of laws and public policies, participants revealed that rights holders are often excluded from decision making spaces. Bureaucratic bottlenecks in institutions that develop and implement policies, inadequate mentorship and capacity were identified as factors that limit the experience of right holders. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The Factors that influence compliance and improvement of the SRHR regulations include lack of political will, corruption, unstable political landscape, election violence, non-prioritisation of SRHR, limited platforms for inclusion in decision making spaces among others. On access to spaces, it was noted that LBTQI women have indirect access to national and direct access to international spaces. Women who are affected by displacement do not have access to national and international advocacy spaces. Persons with disabilities have limited access to national and international advocacy spaces. Other rightsholders such as women living with HIV have access to national and international spaces. On the experience of rights holders in the development and promotion of laws and public policies, participants revealed that rights holders are often excluded from decision making spaces. Bureaucratic bottlenecks in institutions that develop and implement policies, inadequate mentorship and capacity were identified as factors that limit the experience of right holders. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The Factors that influence compliance and improvement of the SRHR regulations include lack of political will, corruption, unstable political landscape, election violence, non-prioritisation of SRHR, limited platforms for inclusion in decision making spaces among others. On access to spaces, it was noted that LBTQI women have indirect access to national and direct access to international spaces. Women who are affected by displacement do not have access to national and international advocacy spaces. Persons with disabilities have limited access to national and international advocacy spaces. Other rightsholders such as women living with HIV have access to national and international spaces. On the experience of rights holders in the development and promotion of laws and public policies, participants revealed that rights holders are often excluded from decision making spaces. Bureaucratic bottlenecks in institutions that develop and implement policies, inadequate mentorship and capacity were identified as factors that limit the experience of right holders. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The Factors that influence compliance and improvement of the SRHR regulations include lack of political will, corruption, unstable political landscape, election violence, non-prioritisation of SRHR, limited platforms for inclusion in decision making spaces among others. On access to spaces, it was noted that LBTQI women have indirect access to national and direct access to international spaces. Women who are affected by displacement do not have access to national and international advocacy spaces. Persons with disabilities have limited access to national and international advocacy spaces. Other rightsholders such as women living with HIV have access to national and international spaces. On the experience of rights holders in the development and promotion of laws and public policies, participants revealed that rights holders are often excluded from decision making spaces. Bureaucratic bottlenecks in institutions that develop and implement policies, inadequate mentorship and capacity were identified as factors that limit the experience of right holders. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead NA-NAMRA-04822224-WL-UG Positive Vibes Trust This acitvity focuses on supporting young women rightsholders to claim their sexual and reproductive health and rights The goal for this activity is by the end of 2025, have resilient young women who play a leading role in strengthened and inclusive organisations and movements that enjoy increased public support and have convinced duty-bearers and health-service providers to take steps towards implementing laws, policies and practices that respect and protect these young women’s SRH-R. The people we are targeting are young women with disabilities, living with HIV, affected by displacement and/or identifying as LBTI. Positive Vibes Positive Vibes Positive Vibes Trust info@positivevibes.org https://positivevibes.org 49 Pasteur Street, Windhoek, Namibia Namibia Uganda Reproductive health care 81600.6 133287.86 48290.86 53083.69 34784.5 8563.96 Expenditure Q1-Q2 21 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 44080.92 Expenditure Q3-Q4 21 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 148534.89 Expenditure Q1-Q2 22 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 34964.36 Expenditure Q3-Q4 22 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 16255.86 Expenditure Q1-Q2 23 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 53018.79 Expenditure Q3-Q4 23 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 19012.89 Expenditure Q1-Q2 24 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 24625.94 Expenditure Q3-Q4 24 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 18180.83 Expenditure Q1-Q2 25 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes 42498.02 Expenditure Q3-Q4 25 Positive Vibes Positive Vibes The Ugandan political and social environment is very restrictive of SRHR and human rights issues, especially for young women who identify as LBTI, live with HIV, with disabilities, and are affected by displacement. The civic space in Uganda is still precarious to the SRHR champions and practitioners serving and working with these groups. For instance, from the legal perspective, the contradicting laws i.e., the HIV prevention and Control Act with the provision on compulsory testing and intentional infection criminalize people living with HIV and AIDS. Though repealed, Uganda security agencies continue to use provisions of the Anti-homosexuality (2014) Act to discriminate, harass and criminalize LBTI persons. In addition, CSOs and champions of safe abortion are always targeted with the pretext that abortion is illegal in Uganda despite the few exceptions. Threats of deregistration, limited freedoms of assembly for minority focused CSOs, freezing bank accounts, frequent media censorship, and gagging of social media. However, despite these threats, several enabling factors are also in place; several CSOs serving and working with sexual minorities have known offices, are fully registered, have access to policy spaces, have engaged the government to the extent of litigation for Human Rights Violations. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The Ugandan political and social environment is very restrictive of SRHR and human rights issues, especially for young women who identify as LBTI, live with HIV, with disabilities, and are affected by displacement. The civic space in Uganda is still precarious to the SRHR champions and practitioners serving and working with these groups. For instance, from the legal perspective, the contradicting laws i.e., the HIV prevention and Control Act with the provision on compulsory testing and intentional infection criminalize people living with HIV and AIDS. Though repealed, Uganda security agencies continue to use provisions of the Anti-homosexuality (2014) Act to discriminate, harass and criminalize LBTI persons. In addition, CSOs and champions of safe abortion are always targeted with the pretext that abortion is illegal in Uganda despite the few exceptions. Threats of deregistration, limited freedoms of assembly for minority focused CSOs, freezing bank accounts, frequent media censorship, and gagging of social media. However, despite these threats, several enabling factors are also in place; several CSOs serving and working with sexual minorities have known offices, are fully registered, have access to policy spaces, have engaged the government to the extent of litigation for Human Rights Violations. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The Ugandan political and social environment is very restrictive of SRHR and human rights issues, especially for young women who identify as LBTI, live with HIV, with disabilities, and are affected by displacement. The civic space in Uganda is still precarious to the SRHR champions and practitioners serving and working with these groups. For instance, from the legal perspective, the contradicting laws i.e., the HIV prevention and Control Act with the provision on compulsory testing and intentional infection criminalize people living with HIV and AIDS. Though repealed, Uganda security agencies continue to use provisions of the Anti-homosexuality (2014) Act to discriminate, harass and criminalize LBTI persons. In addition, CSOs and champions of safe abortion are always targeted with the pretext that abortion is illegal in Uganda despite the few exceptions. Threats of deregistration, limited freedoms of assembly for minority focused CSOs, freezing bank accounts, frequent media censorship, and gagging of social media. However, despite these threats, several enabling factors are also in place; several CSOs serving and working with sexual minorities have known offices, are fully registered, have access to policy spaces, have engaged the government to the extent of litigation for Human Rights Violations. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The Ugandan political and social environment is very restrictive of SRHR and human rights issues, especially for young women who identify as LBTI, live with HIV, with disabilities, and are affected by displacement. The civic space in Uganda is still precarious to the SRHR champions and practitioners serving and working with these groups. For instance, from the legal perspective, the contradicting laws i.e., the HIV prevention and Control Act with the provision on compulsory testing and intentional infection criminalize people living with HIV and AIDS. Though repealed, Uganda security agencies continue to use provisions of the Anti-homosexuality (2014) Act to discriminate, harass and criminalize LBTI persons. In addition, CSOs and champions of safe abortion are always targeted with the pretext that abortion is illegal in Uganda despite the few exceptions. Threats of deregistration, limited freedoms of assembly for minority focused CSOs, freezing bank accounts, frequent media censorship, and gagging of social media. However, despite these threats, several enabling factors are also in place; several CSOs serving and working with sexual minorities have known offices, are fully registered, have access to policy spaces, have engaged the government to the extent of litigation for Human Rights Violations. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The Ugandan political and social environment is very restrictive of SRHR and human rights issues, especially for young women who identify as LBTI, live with HIV, with disabilities, and are affected by displacement. The civic space in Uganda is still precarious to the SRHR champions and practitioners serving and working with these groups. For instance, from the legal perspective, the contradicting laws i.e., the HIV prevention and Control Act with the provision on compulsory testing and intentional infection criminalize people living with HIV and AIDS. Though repealed, Uganda security agencies continue to use provisions of the Anti-homosexuality (2014) Act to discriminate, harass and criminalize LBTI persons. In addition, CSOs and champions of safe abortion are always targeted with the pretext that abortion is illegal in Uganda despite the few exceptions. Threats of deregistration, limited freedoms of assembly for minority focused CSOs, freezing bank accounts, frequent media censorship, and gagging of social media. However, despite these threats, several enabling factors are also in place; several CSOs serving and working with sexual minorities have known offices, are fully registered, have access to policy spaces, have engaged the government to the extent of litigation for Human Rights Violations. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The Ugandan political and social environment is very restrictive of SRHR and human rights issues, especially for young women who identify as LBTI, live with HIV, with disabilities, and are affected by displacement. The civic space in Uganda is still precarious to the SRHR champions and practitioners serving and working with these groups. For instance, from the legal perspective, the contradicting laws i.e., the HIV prevention and Control Act with the provision on compulsory testing and intentional infection criminalize people living with HIV and AIDS. Though repealed, Uganda security agencies continue to use provisions of the Anti-homosexuality (2014) Act to discriminate, harass and criminalize LBTI persons. In addition, CSOs and champions of safe abortion are always targeted with the pretext that abortion is illegal in Uganda despite the few exceptions. Threats of deregistration, limited freedoms of assembly for minority focused CSOs, freezing bank accounts, frequent media censorship, and gagging of social media. However, despite these threats, several enabling factors are also in place; several CSOs serving and working with sexual minorities have known offices, are fully registered, have access to policy spaces, have engaged the government to the extent of litigation for Human Rights Violations. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The Ugandan political and social environment is very restrictive of SRHR and human rights issues, especially for young women who identify as LBTI, live with HIV, with disabilities, and are affected by displacement. The civic space in Uganda is still precarious to the SRHR champions and practitioners serving and working with these groups. For instance, from the legal perspective, the contradicting laws i.e., the HIV prevention and Control Act with the provision on compulsory testing and intentional infection criminalize people living with HIV and AIDS. Though repealed, Uganda security agencies continue to use provisions of the Anti-homosexuality (2014) Act to discriminate, harass and criminalize LBTI persons. In addition, CSOs and champions of safe abortion are always targeted with the pretext that abortion is illegal in Uganda despite the few exceptions. Threats of deregistration, limited freedoms of assembly for minority focused CSOs, freezing bank accounts, frequent media censorship, and gagging of social media. However, despite these threats, several enabling factors are also in place; several CSOs serving and working with sexual minorities have known offices, are fully registered, have access to policy spaces, have engaged the government to the extent of litigation for Human Rights Violations. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The Ugandan political and social environment is very restrictive of SRHR and human rights issues, especially for young women who identify as LBTI, live with HIV, with disabilities, and are affected by displacement. The civic space in Uganda is still precarious to the SRHR champions and practitioners serving and working with these groups. For instance, from the legal perspective, the contradicting laws i.e., the HIV prevention and Control Act with the provision on compulsory testing and intentional infection criminalize people living with HIV and AIDS. Though repealed, Uganda security agencies continue to use provisions of the Anti-homosexuality (2014) Act to discriminate, harass and criminalize LBTI persons. In addition, CSOs and champions of safe abortion are always targeted with the pretext that abortion is illegal in Uganda despite the few exceptions. Threats of deregistration, limited freedoms of assembly for minority focused CSOs, freezing bank accounts, frequent media censorship, and gagging of social media. However, despite these threats, several enabling factors are also in place; several CSOs serving and working with sexual minorities have known offices, are fully registered, have access to policy spaces, have engaged the government to the extent of litigation for Human Rights Violations. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The Ugandan political and social environment is very restrictive of SRHR and human rights issues, especially for young women who identify as LBTI, live with HIV, with disabilities, and are affected by displacement. The civic space in Uganda is still precarious to the SRHR champions and practitioners serving and working with these groups. For instance, from the legal perspective, the contradicting laws i.e., the HIV prevention and Control Act with the provision on compulsory testing and intentional infection criminalize people living with HIV and AIDS. Though repealed, Uganda security agencies continue to use provisions of the Anti-homosexuality (2014) Act to discriminate, harass and criminalize LBTI persons. In addition, CSOs and champions of safe abortion are always targeted with the pretext that abortion is illegal in Uganda despite the few exceptions. Threats of deregistration, limited freedoms of assembly for minority focused CSOs, freezing bank accounts, frequent media censorship, and gagging of social media. However, despite these threats, several enabling factors are also in place; several CSOs serving and working with sexual minorities have known offices, are fully registered, have access to policy spaces, have engaged the government to the extent of litigation for Human Rights Violations. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead The Ugandan political and social environment is very restrictive of SRHR and human rights issues, especially for young women who identify as LBTI, live with HIV, with disabilities, and are affected by displacement. The civic space in Uganda is still precarious to the SRHR champions and practitioners serving and working with these groups. For instance, from the legal perspective, the contradicting laws i.e., the HIV prevention and Control Act with the provision on compulsory testing and intentional infection criminalize people living with HIV and AIDS. Though repealed, Uganda security agencies continue to use provisions of the Anti-homosexuality (2014) Act to discriminate, harass and criminalize LBTI persons. In addition, CSOs and champions of safe abortion are always targeted with the pretext that abortion is illegal in Uganda despite the few exceptions. Threats of deregistration, limited freedoms of assembly for minority focused CSOs, freezing bank accounts, frequent media censorship, and gagging of social media. However, despite these threats, several enabling factors are also in place; several CSOs serving and working with sexual minorities have known offices, are fully registered, have access to policy spaces, have engaged the government to the extent of litigation for Human Rights Violations. We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead We contributed to the consolidated results reported by HIVOS under We Lead